文章詳目資料

圖書資訊學刊 CSSCIScopusTSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 從臺灣學者引文角度看圖書資訊學期刊及學者之評鑑
卷期 6:1/2
並列篇名 Evaluation of Journals and Researchers in Library and Information Science: Perspectives from Citations by Taiwan LIS Scholars
作者 黃慕萱
頁次 001-027
關鍵字 圖書資訊學學術評鑑期刊評鑑學者評鑑書目計量學引文分析Library and Information ScienceResearch EvaluationAcademic evaluationJourual EvaluationResearcher EvaluationBibliometricsCitation AnalysisTSSCI
出刊日期 200806

中文摘要

本文採用書目計量法,以臺灣地區出版之圖書資訊學一級期刊為研究對象,從臺灣學者之引文角度,探討圖書資訊學領域之期刊評鎧與學者評鑑。在期刊評鑑方面,比較一級期刊引用次數排名與萱灣人丈乎于/丈合引(TaiwanHumanities Citation Index, THCI)資料庫期刊引用 次數排名之差異,發現兩者達統計上之顯著相關,表示以少數優良期刊的引文排名即可大致上主現多數圖資期刊的影響力;另比較一級期刊引用英文期刊排名與劫刊于/月夜去(JournalCitation Report, JCR)影響係數排名之差異,發現兩者雖有一定程度的相關,但未達統計上顯 著水準'顯示JCR期刊排名並不能完全代表其在臺灣的影響力。在學者評鎧方面,本文比較圖書資訊學學者在一級期刊及THCI期刊被引用次數排名與其主持國科會專題研究計畫數之差異,發現排除干擾樣本後,兩種排名與計畫數之間的關係均未達統計上之顯著相關,因此以引文分析來評鎧圖資學者的學術成就需相當謹慎。

英文摘要

This article uses bibliometric analysis to study the evaluation of journals and researchers in the field of library and information science in Taiwan. For journal evaluation, the results show no statistically significant difference between the rankings of the citations cited by top LIS journals and by THCI journals. This suggests that the citation numbers of top LIS journals can be used to evaluate all the LIS journals. The results also show that the relationship between the rankings of JCR LIS journals and the rankings of the JCR LIS journals cited by top LIS journals is not statistically significant. This indicates that the rankings of the JCR LIS journals can not totally show their impacts on Taiwan LIS journals. For researcher evaluation, the results reveal that the correlation between the rankings of researchers cited by top LIS journals and the number of the research projects of National Science Council (NSC) conducted by the researchers is not significant. This suggests using citation analyses as the only method to evaluate LIS researchers should be viewed with more prudence with the results.

相關文獻