釋字第684號解釋公布後，大學的特別權力關係已經徹底走入歷史，大學生基本權保障與限制將成為大學法制與行政的爭議核心，如何從我國憲法的簡單規定出發，將大學生基本權保障與限制的複雜內涵，予以清楚的具體類型化並分析，是一項困難的憲法學任務。本文嘗試參考德國憲法與《大學法》的學理與實務：首先，探討大學生基本權保障的主體與限制；其次，大學生一般基本權的保障與衝突；再者，分析大學生學習自由的特別保障與限制；最後，期待本文在此的具體類型化與詳細分析，可以在未來提供相關行政與司法機關解決爭議的出路。

After the handdown of Juridical Yuan Interpretation No. 684, which called for an end to the theory of the special power relationship between the college and its students, the protections and limitations of college students’ fundamental rights have become the core issue of the statutory regime of the administration of the higher education. How to start from the simple stipulations of the Constitution to clearly and concretely categorize and analyze the complicated contents of the protections and limitations of college students’ fundamental rights is a difficult task of the constitutionism. This article attempts to take the legal theories and practices of the German constitution and the Higher Education Act as references. Firstly, this article will discuss the subjectivity and limitations of the fundamental rights of college students. Secondly, this article will analyze the protections and conflicts of the general fundamental rights of college students and then analyze the special protections and limitations on college students’ freedom of learning. Finally, this Article expects to apply the accomplished concrete categorization and detailed analysis to furnishing a resolution for future disputes as a reference to relevant administrative and judicial institutions.