文章詳目資料

職能治療學會雜誌

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 自閉症類群障礙症孩童與一般發展孩童心智理論能力與表現之比較
卷期 34:2
並列篇名 A Comparison of Theory of Mind Capacity and Performance in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development
作者 邱琬庭李雅珍林健禾江岱蓉陳承德陳官琳
頁次 198-213
關鍵字 自閉症類群障礙症一般發展孩童心智理論Autism Spectrum DisorderTypically Developing ChildrenTheory of MindTSCI
出刊日期 201612
DOI 10.6594/JTOTA.2016.34(2).03

中文摘要

評估掌握自閉症類群障礙症 (autism spectrum disorder, ASD) 孩童的心智理論 (theory of mind, ToM) 是介入其社交困難的關鍵。孩童的ToM 評估可分為能力 (capacity) 與表現 (performance) 二層面。然而,目前多是以實驗室標準化情境作 業評估孩童ToM 能力,而非日常生活中實際的ToM 表現,其ToM 能力的評估結 果無法直接類推至表現。此外,國內關於孩童ToM 的研究為數不多,更鮮少同時 比較ASD 孩童與一般發展 (typically developing, TD) 孩童的ToM 表現。因此,臨 床人員無法瞭解ASD 與TD 孩童ToM 能力與表現之差異,進而無法提供相對應 的介入。故本研究目的為同時比較ASD 與TD 孩童的ToM 能力及表現之差異。 共62 位以語言理解能力配對之3-7 歲的孩童參與此研究,ASD 與TD 孩童各31 名,平均皆具中等程度語言理解能力。本研究分別以心智理論測驗 (Theory of Mind Task Battery, ToMTB) 與心智理論量表中文版 (Chinese version of Theory of Mind Inventory-2, ToMI-2-C) 評估孩童之ToM 能力與表現。以二因子變異數分析 (two-way ANOVA) 檢驗ASD 與TD 組在ToMTB 與ToMI-2-C 分數是否有顯著差 異。結果發現ASD與TD組的ToMTB與ToMI-2-C分數皆達顯著差異 (p < 0.000)。 此外,由研究結果亦得知,ASD 組孩童的ToM 能力與表現皆落後TD 組一個發展 階段,對3-7 歲具中等程度語言理解能力的ASD 孩童來說,不論是ToM 的能力 或表現,從基本ToM 過渡到進階ToM 可能是發展的瓶頸。本研究結果可作為ASD 孩童臨床評估(ToM 能力與表現)與其治療計畫擬定之實證參考。

英文摘要

Assessments of ToM can be divided into two constructs: capacity and performance, which represent the ToM function in the laboratory and daily context, respectively. However, only few studies examine the ToM capacity and performance simultaneously in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) children. Therefore, this study was to examine whether the differences exist in both ToM capacity and performance between children with ASD and TD children to fully capture the ToM of children with ASD. A total of 62 children aged 3 to 7 years, including 31 children with ASD and 31 TD children matched for their verbal ability, participated in this study. The Theory of Mind Task Battery and the Theory of Mind Inventory-2-Chinese version were administered to assess children’s ToM capacity and performance, respectively. Two-way analysis of variance was used to examine whether there were significant differences in ToM capacity and performance between children with ASD and TD children. We found that significant differences existed in ToM capacity (F5.61, p = .021) and performance (F23.13, p < .000) between children with ASD and TD children. Additionally, most of children with ASD were in the stage of the basic mental development, while most of TD children were in the stage of advanced mental development. This result suggests that children with ASD are one stage behind TD children in both ToM capacity and performance, although their verbal comprehension was at the same level of TD children. Results highlight the importance to assess ToM capacity and performance in children with ASD.

相關文獻