在一個多元社會中，對於不同精神思想、政治意識以及文化認同的現象、問題與看法，每個人或群體都可能有其差異性的對立。這樣的文化差異或文化多樣性的開展，其實也是文化成長及進步的泉源。在立憲主義的發展下，落實個人自我實現的憲法上基本權保障體系，對這種多元文化差異的保護，可經由保障個人自我實現而達成，這也就是憲法上文化國所追求的國家目標。在此規定下，多元文化國作為我國憲法的國家目標，比純粹照顧人民精神生活的文化國更具實質意義，因為它不僅包含了文化國的傳統憲法保障內涵，而且在現代多元社會的快速變遷下，也促成人在合憲秩序下最大自我實現的可能。事實上，憲法上不同文化基本權的保障，也涉及到對多樣的文化差異的保護情形。我國憲法增修條文第10條第11項的規定中明文提及：「國家肯定多元文化。」這個規定的目的，在於透過憲法的規範，建構多元文化國的憲法保障基礎，賦予國家保護不同或多樣文化差異的義務，而這必須透過其國家的中立與寬容來落實。國家！國家！得（物質有錢）也國家；失（精神虛無）也國家！作為一個文化國家的執政者，應該盡量朝落實城鄉精神文化生活的促進平衡，以及提供居住在鄉下地方人民的精神文化出路去設計，使每個人民盡可能地共享文化國家的精神文化資源，這也是文化公民權所訴諸的。

In our modem pluralistic society, individuals (or groups) may express opposing views with others in the realms of spiritual thinking, political ideology and cultural recognition. Theorists have argued that the development of the cultural differences or diversity can be a source of strength, which fosters the growth and development of the culture. In fact, the Amendment X, Section I of the Constitution of the Republic of China, which provides “The State affirms cultural pluralism.”, constructs the foundation of constitutional protection on Pluralistic Cultures Country and imposes an obligation upon the state to protect the cultural diversity and heterogeneousity, and all of these should be realized by the way of construction of Neutral Principle and Principle of Charity. Country! Country! You make me gain, and you also make me lose! As a ruler in a culture state, he should try his vest to facilitate the balance fulfillment of spiritual cultural life of the city and that of the country. He should also design to provide country people with spiritual culture, in order to let every people share the spiritual and cultural resources in a culture state. This is the concept of so-called “the cultural civil rights”.