本文乃基於牟先生批評蕺山對於朱子學的理解有誤，而吾人則對牟先生此文做進一步的討論。其中主要涉及到朱子學理氣二元之區分是否有問題？蕺山批評此超越的區分，其道德理想性是
否因而喪失而流為下墮的學問？吾人並對理與氣的重要性、優先性做一解釋，討論理是否只是氣的謂詞？理與氣何者為實、何者為名？究是朱子學或蕺山學較能合於先秦儒者之原意？及牟先生對於蕺山思想是否有其相應之理解？

This article explores Mr. Mou’s criticism on Ji Shan’sinaccurate understanding on Chu Hsi theory. It studyies Mr. Mou’ article
and develops the second introduction, with main concern on whether the
division of Li Chi binary of Chu His theory is inaccurate. Does Ji Shan’s
criticism on the transcendent division become declining study because of
losing the idealism? We further elaborate the importance and priority of
Li and Chi and discuss if Li is simply the predicate of Chi. With regard
to Li and Chi, which is the reality and which is the name? Does Chu Hsi
theory or Ji Shan Theory meet the original intention of the Confucianists
of Chin Dynasty? Does Mr. Mou have the corresponding understanding
on Ji Shan’s thoughts?