最近幾年，在以電視為媒介的大眾傳媒中，逐漸形成了兩種關於「建國六十週年」和「改革開放三十週年」的敘述策略。前者通過把50-70年代敘述為「激情燃燒的歲月」，使得革命歷史不被作為異質性的存在，而縫合了70-80年代之交的歷史斷裂；後者則把90年代中期的下崗事件書寫為一種個人的創傷體驗，通過成功地治癒傷口而完成對當下社會的認同。這樣兩種策略不僅使得70-80年之交的「傷痕」獲得修復，而且對於90年代中期出現的「改革共識」的破裂也做出了適當的回應。也就是說，一種日漸顯影的主流意識形態不僅使得50-70年代的革命歷史和80年代以來的現代化歷史被順暢地組接在一起，而且使得改革開放內部的裂痕也獲得某種程度上的修復。因此，縫合斷裂和治癒傷口成為主流意識形態確立文化領導權的重要方式。

In the recent years, two narrative strategies of 60 anniversary of the foundation of PRC and 30 anniversary of Opening Policy have appeared in mass media especially in TV programs. The former strategy successfully sutured the historical cracks of 1970s-1980s by depicting those periods as being heated and enthusiastic and making the revolutionary history no longer dissident. The latter strategy, however, describes the layoff as personal wounded experience and fulfilled the social identity by healing the wounds. These two strategies not only smoothly linked the revolutionary history of 1950s-1970s and the modern history since 1980s, and in a sense, it restored the cracks of opening policy in mid 90s. Therefore, Suturing cracks and healing wounds have been gradually important means for mainstream ideology to make cultural hegemony.