本研究提出投票式權重評選法，結合平衡計分卡模式以評估多目標決策議題，應用「顧客面(軍事能力)、內部流程面(後勤補給與維修效率)、學習與成長(科技與創新)、財務面(獲得成本)」等四個衡量指標，透過文獻探討與問卷調查方式，進行企業績效評估與管理，提供決策者更多客觀量化數據，此量化平衡計分卡分析模式乃運用多目標決策之多層級分析架構，以簡化複雜問題；然後， 「由上而下」針對平衡計分卡各項指標進行投票、加權與量化受評估之可行方案，最後運用加權評分法，評選最佳可行方案。本文以「海軍乾塢與船臺軍事工程評選」為個案研究，運用平衡計分卡結合投票式權重評選方法、成本效益及適用性分析，評估「船臺軍事工程」為較佳可行方案。

This paper proposes a new “Vote-Ranking” method to “Balanced Scorecard (BSC)” analytic process to assess “Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)” issues. By means of literature review and questionary using “Customer (military capability), Internal Business Processes (logistic support and maintenance effectiveness), Learning and Growth (technology and innovation), and Financial (life cycle cost)”, more detailed and quantified performance management data are provided for decision-maker. The quantitative BSC method adopts the concept of MCDM, which uses a multi-hierarchy scheme to simply complicate problems. And
then, from top to down, the indices of BSC will be voted, weighted and quantitative to assess the competitive alternatives. We use the total weighted scores method to get the best strategy alternatives. The cost-effective and suitability comparative analysis of military engineering
project investment between dry dock and slipway in navy is taken as a case study in the paper. The quantitative BSC method incorporated with vote-ranking is applied to assess the competitive alternatives of the case study. Finally, the results suggest “slipway military engineering project” is the adoptable project.