篇名 | 試論天師道和全真道對《老子》章句的解讀──以《老子想爾注》、《無為清靜長生真人至真語錄》、《清和真人北游語錄》為討論文本 |
---|---|
卷期 | 18 |
並列篇名 | Different interpretations of Lao Zi |
作者 | 王 奕 然 |
頁次 | 041-056 |
關鍵字 | 老子 、 老子想爾注 、 全真道 、 Lao Zi 、 Lao-Zi Xiang-Er Commentary 、 Tao in the Quanzhen School of Taoism |
出刊日期 | 201206 |
於本文中,筆者擇取《老子想爾注》、《無為清靜長生真人至真語錄》、《清和真人北游語錄》等書,作為討論的文本資料。《老子想爾注》展現了神仙道教的思想,劉處玄與尹志平則是金元時的全真道人物。天師道與全真道,同屬宗教性之道教團體,兩相對照,劉、尹之說實展現出一種兼容外教的思維。筆者欲藉由對照諸說,考察雙方對《老子》義理的詮釋,其中的異同處,實與彼此自身義理體系有關。
In this essay, I present a discussion about three scholars' different
interpretations of Lao Zi. Zhang Daoling's writing Lao-Zi Xing-Er Commentary is an important document of Taoism of Lao-Zi. His interpretation obviously distorts the original meaning of Lao Zi and states the religious thoughts of Taoism of Lao-Zi.Otherwise, Liu chu xuan and Yin zhi ping are the representatives of the Quanzhen School of Taoism, and they have dissimilar statements about Lao Zi.