本文以台北都會區東南亞消費空間為例，探討「族裔領域化」的機制和作用。族裔領域化即「族裔性」在領域上的構成，常呈現為「族裔化地方」的形成，但不局限於地理聚集，還牽涉多重跨界和劃界動態。台灣的東南亞族裔領域化往往呈現為不同於「族裔聚居區」或「飛地」的節奏化消費地景，以東南亞華人和婚姻移民為中介角色，隨著交通、地租和文化供需而位於特定區位。這些特性須安置於跨國流移、公民資格差別化賦予、都市治理策略，以及階級劃界等，不同尺度的領域化機制中來理解，展現為幾種相互重疊的消費地景類型：文化經濟邏輯下的異國象徵地景、族裔經濟邏輯下的維生地景、公民資格和地產權保障下的族裔飛地，以及階級劃界與都市更新下竄流的縫隙地景。本文亦展望這些族裔化地方的可能正向作用：就東南亞族裔而言，族裔化地方成為族裔經濟網絡和族裔公共空間的跨國節點，可能發揮從縫隙到槓桿的功效。就台灣社會而言，族裔領域化呈現了由劃界到中介混雜的動態，可能開展異類共存、反思我群的倫理效果；亦即族裔化地方的存在和運作，有構成多元族裔城市之交流邊境和「反身鏡域」的潛能。

This paper discusses the structural mechanisms and functions of “ethnic territorialization” through the case of Southeast Asian consumptive space in Taipei metropolitan area. Ethnic territorialization means the territorially construction of ethnicity which often leads to the forming of ethnic places or clusters, but it also involves multiple boundary-crossing and boundary-making. Firstly, the author argues that the mechanisms of Taipei’s Southeast Asian ethnic territorialization include transnational diaspora, difference in citizenship, urban governance strategies, and class boundary-making which act on different geographical scales. And the combination of different mechanisms brings about four overlapping types of consumptive landscapes: exotic landscape under cultural economy, survival landscape under ethnic economy, ethnic enclave under citizenship and house ownership, and the flowing interstitial landscape under class exclusion and urban renewal. Finally, in prospecting for the positive functions of these ethnic places, there are two dimensions: (1) for the Southeast Asian migrants, they act as transnational nodes of ethnic economic network and ethnic public space which may change from marginal “interstice” to social “levers”; and (2) for Taiwanese society, these ethnic places arouse dynamics of border-crossing and hybridity, and may foster a spatial ethics of coexistence for acting as “reflexive heterotopia” in a multi-ethnic city.