由鍾惺、譚元春選評的《唐詩歸》，在晚明曾造成「承學之士，家置一編，奉之如尼丘之刪定」的盛況；而由沈德潛所選評的《唐詩別裁集》，在清代乾隆年間，也有「一洗歷下、竟陵之陋，海內承學者幾於家有其書」的稱譽。也因此，學界目前對這兩本唐詩選本所作的研究實不在少數，但結合兩書進行比較研究者，目前仍未得見。鑑於兩書皆為盛行當世並頗具影響力的唐詩選本；兩家選詩也都以盛唐為主；書中選錄的杜詩數量，並都高居唐代詩家首位。為能具體選詩要旨差異對杜詩選評所造成的影響，本文擬先概述兩家選詩宗旨，再透過兩部唐詩選本所選的杜甫詩體、詩題，並由兩家相關詩評內容進行比較，期能透過這兩本盛行當世的唐詩選本，具體呈現出晚明與盛清詩壇對杜詩接受觀念的轉變。

"Tang Shi Gui", compiled by Zhing Xing and Tan Yuan Chun, made a sensation in the late Ming Dynasty that every intellectual had one. "Tang Shi BieCaiJi" which was compiled by Chen De Qian had a similar comment as well as Tang Shi Guiduring the Qing Qian Long Dynasty. Therefore, there are numerous interpretations and paper on the two Tang poetry books respectively, yet the study on comparing the two books is none. The two books owned powerful influence since the poems selected in the books were from the thriving Tang, and the quantity of Dufu's poems adopted in was the most among other poets in Tang Dynasty. However, the intentions of compiling the two books were different; hence, the themes, meters, and comments were definitely disparate. Comparing the two books not only can make a clear the advocacies between the two factions, but also can make an extensive realization how wide and what the transition the scholars in the late Ming and thriving Tang accepted Dufu's poems. This study starts from sketching the intentions of poem selectionfrom the two factions, and then steps forward to analyze the themes and meters, compare the poem comments to present the features they outlined Dufu's poems.