本文嘗試以利害關係人觀點，分別從四個評估指標，評估苗栗縣攜手計畫補救教學實施方案執行之成效，運用文件分析及訪談研究方法，採立意取樣，探求利害關係人，如教育人員、學生、家長、教師的訴求、關切與爭議。研究發現包括：一、在「目標計畫達成度」方面，學生的學習興趣有明顯的提升，學習態度變得主動積極，有助於學業成績的提升；二、在「政策設計的妥適性」方面，實施方式雖適當合理，但缺少補救教學方案設計及課程規劃；三、在「執行者的態度與意向」方面，寒假因時間較短，教師、學生幾乎都沒意願，而暑假則僅有部分支援教師有意願，且執行成效有待檢視；四、在「回應性的感受」方面，對執行程序、課程安排均感滿意；利害關係人普遍期待能有足夠的人力資源、以及彈性開放上課節數、不要為評鑑而評鑑、教學活潑化等等。

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Hand-in-Hand Plan After-School Support Policy of Miaoli County and to offer suggestions for government officials and school administrative and teaching staff to fine tune the way they execute this policy for improved policy results. This study assesses four aspects of the policy: policy targets achievement, policy design appropriateness, policy executors' attitude, and study subjects' response. Documents such as interview records and diaries were reviewed to identify the concerns of the objects. This study used purposive sampling, and nine people were selected as research subjects that represented county education officials, school administrators, school teachers, students, and parents. This study has identified four major findings towards its goals.1. On policy targets achievement, it found that students in the plan showed elevated interest in learning and they became more active and positive about learning. The Plan is instrumental in improving the students' grades.2. On policy design, it found the policy had been properly designed, but project funding was inadequate.3. On policy executors' attitude, almost nobody wanted to participate in the project during winter breaks and only some people had some willingness during summer breaks.4. On the feelings of the subjects, the willingness to execute the project procedures, design the curriculum, and stay with the project for another semester seems generally high.