本體論的大前提基本上不可否定本體的存在，所以以「本體」為基礎的哲學終極落入於「存在之陷阱」。並且以「無限、全體、必然、絕對」的觀念所作的哲學概念亦是無法用別的概念代替，因此其哲學概念亦終極落入於「概念之陷阱」。因此以「方法」（How）來開始發問的「方法論的世界觀」來接近事物，則一切事物只是一個方法而已。把「無」（nothing）使用為逆說的方法，則可以得到如「無然觀」一樣的方法論的世界觀。由以方法（How）為出發點之「無然觀」來從開始「存在」亦是不成問題的。並且因為無然觀自身用否定自我的存在而維持自我的整體性，所以「存在之陷阱」就根本不存在了。又既存的概念及以此所形成的哲學思想亦可以看做一個方法。因此方法論的世界觀不再落入於「概念之陷阱」。

The key premise of ontology is that the existence of noumenon is unrefuted. Therefore, the ontological realm of philosophy is subject to the “pitfalls of existence.” Likewise, philosophical concepts derived from notions of infinity, entirety, necessity, and absoluteness cannot be replaced with any other term. Therefore, the ontological realm of philosophy is also subject to the “pitfalls of concepts.” However, if we approach objects through a methodological worldview which begins by asking the question of “how,” all objects can be viewed through the lens of a uniform method. If we were to rely paradoxically on nothingness (無), a methodological worldview such as the view point of Woo-Ran (無然觀) can be achieved. The view point of Woo-Ran which begins with the question of how is not premised on existence at the outset. It is therefore fundamentally free from the pitfalls of existence because the core of this viewpoint is the denial of existence. Furthermore, under this view, existing concepts and derivative philosophies can also be viewed as a one of many methods. As a result, the methodological worldview is also free from the pitfalls of concepts.