文章詳目資料

教育研究月刊

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 教育行政的研究倫理
卷期 272
並列篇名 Research Ethics of Educational Administration
作者 黃乃熒
頁次 057-073
關鍵字 研究倫理教育行政組織理論research ethicseducational administrationorganizational theory
出刊日期 201612
DOI 10.3966/168063602016120272005

中文摘要

本文意圖探索教育行政倫理研究的新圖像,除了強調研究倫理準則之遵循外,更對於組織理論為本的研究,致力於其複製社會階級設計的察覺,是以,本文先討論教育行政研究倫理的意義,進而探索其爭議及其化解的出路,並主張研究者與研究對象及其相關的人員,都應具備研究倫理的素養,方能維護研究倫理的品質,以提升研究成果的原創性及應用性,來擴大研究的成果,能促進教育進步的動力。依據文獻的分析與討論,本文提出四點的結論,包括:一、能夠落實於研究者才智成長行為的德行;二、爭議緣起於研究者意義延展詮釋的貧乏;三、爭議化解於研究者強化矛盾辨證的調合智慧;四、素養扎根於研究者道德自我批判的心智模式。

英文摘要

The study is to explore the new directions for the research ethics of educational administration. Not only to highlight the importance of following research ethics criteria, but also to devote to the study of organizational theories. This is helpful for the awareness of social-class reproduction. After refi ning the defi nitions of research ethics of educational administration, some controversial issues and the possible solutions would be discussed. It is asserted that all the people in the study should have literacy of research ethics to maintain the quality of studies, and further expand the application and creativity of the research results to make improvement in education. Eventually, the conclusions provide with people, including research ethics of educational administration: (1) could help the development of researchers’ intelligence and virtues; (2) controversies result from the lack of annotations for meaning extension; (3) controversies can be solved by the enhancement of researchers’ coordinate intelligence from the contradictory dialectics; (4) cultivations of the literacy ground in the researchers’ mental model of moral self-critique.

相關文獻