本文旨在探討明清兩代《詩經》學研究上的內在關聯性，最終希望可以推廣而探索明清兩代經學研究上的實質關聯性。本文立基「外部研究」的實證性立場，經由歸納統計《詩經傳說彙纂》與《詩義折中》徵引明人詮說的實況，以及透過《中國基本古籍庫》收錄清儒《詩經》專著徵引明人說解的實情，有效證明清人的《詩經》學專著，確實有接受參考明人《詩經》詮解的事實，從而證明了明清兩代《詩經》學具有內在的關聯性，同時經由許多清儒《詩經》學專著徵引的明人資料，來自清代兩部官書的事實，從而也就證明清代官學對《詩經》學確實產生影響的實況。研究成果有助於實際了解明清兩代《詩經》學上的關聯及官學對學術研究的影響，同時也提供明清經學史、學術史，尤其是《詩經》學史等的相關研究者，部分有效的答案，對相關領域研究的深入與發展，或當有某些助益焉。

This paper examines relationships between studies of the Shijing, in order to explore the actual relationships of the studies of the Chinese Classics during the Ming- Qing period. Looking at how the Qing literati quoted Ming writers’ interpretations of the Shijing, in works such as the Shijing zhuanshuo huizuan (Gathered explanations of Zhu Xi’s Shijing) and the Shiyi zhezhong (Balanced interpretations of the Shijing), as well as citations in a large electronic database, it argues that the interpretations of the Shijing given by Ming writers can truly be found in the studies of the Shijing written by Qing authors and other official academic works compiled at the emperor’s order, thus proving not only that there should be an intrinsic relationship between studies of the Shijing during the Ming and Qing dynasties, but also that Ming studies of the Shijing influenced official academic learning in the Qing period.