《史記》是中國敘事傳統的典範，評點是結合文本的特殊批評方法，討論創作者思維與創作技巧。《史記》評點盛行於明清二朝，過去研究者對於《史記》評點的研究，囿於出版狀況，多集中在明人的評點。蔣善的《史記彙纂》是明末清初的《史記》匯評著作，透過選錄與再造，呈現出蔣善個人的文論特色。筆者以蔣善《史記彙纂》為研究文本，透過引書狀況的統計，發現其評本中引用最多為鍾惺129條最多，其次是陳仁錫和鄧以讚。這樣的引書比例，與凌稚隆《史記評林》選錄評比重不同。蔣善特別選用上述幾人評語，在其《史記彙纂》中以述代作，呈現出特殊的思維建構方法。本研究將以蔣善《史記彙纂》為文本，先以數位人文社會關係網路研究方法，探討分析其引文的比重與規律，觀察其成書思維。再使用文本細讀分析，探討《史記彙纂》一書的評點特色。則完成此論文，除了能夠幫助廓清蔣善評本的特色外，同時也能梳理晚明到清初的《史記》評點學術取向，補充評點學史。並且由於評點的歸納分析，而能獲得若干文術，補充敘事傳統，經典轉化，達成啟發當代思維與創作的意義。

Commenting is a special criticism method combined with the text, discussing the creator’s thinking and creative skills. In the past, researchers have done a lot of research on the commentaries on the "Shiji" of the Ming Dynasty. With the new publication, this study tried to analyze Jiang Shan's critical works. This research used Jiang Shan's "Comment Compilation of Shiji" as the text, and first used the digital humanistic social relationship network research method to analyze the proportion and law of his citations, and observe his thinking in writing. Then used the close reading analysis of the text to explore the critical features of the book "Comment Compilation of Shiji". I hope it can supplement the research content of "Shiji" and enrich the connotation of comment history.