本文主要探討，伽達默爾如何在詮釋學問題意識指引之下超越亞里斯多德的實踐哲學方案。首先，我們將指出伽達默爾在闡釋亞里斯多德實踐智慧概念時遭遇了「公共性疑難」。這一疑難體現為兩個方面，其一是實踐智慧與相互理解之間的內在矛盾，其二是實踐智慧無法提供某種普遍有效的規範和價值。正是這一疑難使得亞里斯多德最終訴諸理論的普遍有效性，從而將實踐智慧作為理論智慧的附屬物。為了克服這一疑難，伽達默爾試圖回到柏拉圖，從而得以實現自身與他者、具體與普遍之間的均衡。與此同時，他重新提出了實踐哲學的普遍性要求，亦即對一種具體的、歷史性的普遍性的建立。

This paper focuses on how Gadamer goes beyond Aristotle’s scheme of practical philosophy guided by hermeneutic problem awareness. First, we will point out that Gadamer encountered an “aporia of the commonality” in his interpretation of Aristotle’s concept of practical wisdom. This dilemma is manifested in two ways: first, the inherent contradiction between practical wisdom and mutual understanding, and second, the inability of practical wisdom to provide some universally valid norms and values. It was this aporia that led Aristotle to resort to the universality of theory, thus making practical wisdom an appendage of theoretical wisdom. It was to overcome this aporia that Gadamer tried to go back to Plato, so as to achieve a balance between selfhood and otherness, between the concrete and the universal. At the same time, he reintroduces the demand for universality in practical philosophy, that is, the establishment of a concrete, historical universality.