唐石經被稱爲是“古本之終，今本之祖”。蜀石經是否與唐石經同祖太和舊本，以及蜀石經對後唐長興本、宋景德本以下有何影響，都是經典文本流傳中不可忽視的環節。以蜀石經《周禮．考工記》殘拓爲對象，從文獻和文字兩方面考察，推知蜀石經與開成石經同祖兼有經注的太和舊本，唯開成石經僅取其經文而略加校勘，蜀石經則兼取經注，故蜀石經注文大致是太和舊本的面貌；長興本注文是在太和舊本基礎上廣收衆本再經校勘的文本，所以與蜀石經注文有不小的差異，張（卣火）《石經注文考異》是其見證。蜀石經注文中略可窺見唐代太和本以前的一些影子，但其校勘粗疏，留下不少譌誤。

The Stone Classics of the Tang Dynasty are regarded as an important document which follows the early version and is the basis of the later versions. The following problems cannot be ignored in the circulation of Confucian Classics: First, whether the Shu 蜀 Stone Classics and Tang 唐 Stone Classics are both formed on the basis of the Taihe 太和 version or not; Second, what is the impact of the Shu Stone Classics on the later Tang Changxing 長興 version, the Northern Song Jingde 景德 version and other later versions? Focusing on the incomplete rubbings of the Shu Stone Classics Zhou Li Kao Gong Ji 周禮考工記, from the literature on the topic and the texts themselves, it can be inferred that the annotated Taihe version is the early version of the Shu Stone Classics and the Kaicheng 開成 Stone Classics. The Kaicheng Stone Classics just takes the text and simply proofreads it, but the Shu Stone Classics takes the text and the notes, so the annotation of the Shu Stone Classics has roughly the appearance of the Taihe version. Also, the annotation of the Changxing version is based on the Taihe version and collates many versions, so there is a big difference between them, which is witnessed by Shi Jing Zhu Wen Kao Yi 石經注文考異. Through the annotation of the Shu Stone Classics, researchers can partially understand the appearance of the Taihe version and some earlier versions, but it is still roughly collated and there are many mistakes.