在晚近的《精神現象學》詮釋中，先驗解讀甚具影響力。無論如何，此一解讀至少有兩種不同的型式。有些學者是依《精神現象學》所使用的論證策略而稱之為先驗，另外一些學者則主張《精神現象學》與康德的先驗觀念論具有理論內容上的親緣性。本文分別檢視司圖瓦特與丕平的詮釋，並批判了這兩種先驗解讀。

Recently the transcendental reading of the Phenomenology of Spirit is quite influential. However, there are at least two types of such a reading. Some scholars regard the Phenomenology of Spirit as transcendental on the ground of the argumentative strategy it employs. Others claim that the Phenomenology of Spirit has a close affinity to Kant’s transcendental idealism with respect to its theoretical composition. This paper examines and criticizes these two patterns of the transcendental reading exemplified by Stewart’s and Pippin’s interpretation respectively.