篇名 | 整合護理研究法的分歧--論方法上的三角交叉檢視法 |
---|---|
卷期 | 6:5 |
並列篇名 | Methodological Triangulation: Reconciliation of Methods in Nursing Research |
作者 | 楊克平 |
頁次 | 436-442 |
關鍵字 | 方法上的三角交叉檢視法 、 護理研究 、 Methodological triangulation 、 Nursing research 、 TSCI 、 MEDLINE 、 Scopus |
出刊日期 | 199810 |
傳統的「科學」研究方法是否全然適用或不適於護理專業﹖護理研究中質、量性的兩極爭議並非是對立的,而是各有其特長和侷限,具有互補和相互對照的功能。本文旨在討論兩大護理研究法之分歧,並介紹一種整合性的多元途徑 - 方法上的三角交叉檢視法。當單一的研究法不足以完全解答一個研究問題時,三角交叉檢視法乃是最能確定的一種解決法。研究者應敏銳而具有變通性,瞭解研究方法的多元性,謹慎地操作,正所謂「運用之妙,存乎一心」。
Is the use of truly scientific method confined only to natural science? Is it the only method appropriate for the nursing profession? In nursing research, the qualitative-quantitative bipolar views should not be against each other because they have complimentary and contrasting functions. This paper presents an overview of the dichotomy of these two methods, and proposes a multi-method: methodological triangulation. When a single research method is inadequate, methodological triangu-lation is used to ensure that the most comprehensive approach is taken to solve a research problem. Researchers are versatile and have an extraordinary power to use the strengths of the two methods with skill.