本研究在「內部稽核」與「外部評鑑」兩項不同程度之工作規範上，分析學術期刊「非引文計量」指標之定義規範，以及其它學術期刊稽核評鑑設計與機制。此外，亦就臺灣和中國大陸期刊出版評鑑發展進行探討，這些指標頗為繁細，常視評鑑者之要求而有不同加權比重之情事。本文試圖辯證和檢討這些指標內容，使其回歸真正具有期刊出版實務意涵與精神旨趣，並建議與討論若干可行之指標。這些指標在於凸顯有別於一般常見引文計量評鑑途徑，補強學術期刊出版評鑑工作之效標。

This study aims at verifying and organizing the role of non-bibliometric indexes respectively in the regulations of the interior audit and of the exterior evaluation in scholarly journal publishing, which would enable the procedure of quality control to operate. In addition, this paper will explain how the technical standards of non-bibliometric indexes can be implemented in use on the basis of varied scales of weighting. To realize the recent development regarding non-bibliometric indexes, a comparison of the different scholarly journal evaluation systems between Taiwan and Mainland China will be brought into discussion. With the help of the explicit indication of non-bibliometric indexes, the application of non-bibliometric standards will become distinguished from the normally conducted bibliometric evaluation. Adoption of the non-bibliometric evaluation system as a result will enhance the evaluative effects of scholarly journal publishing.