本研究主要在探討Peery（1979）、Coie、Coppotelli和Dodge（1982）、Newcomb和Bukowski（1983）與Coie和Dodge（1988）等四種雙向度社會計量地位分類方法的優劣。研究中以154位三、五年級的小學生為樣本，進行四個月的長期研究，分析四種類模式在各類別的分配情形，考驗各模式分類結果的鑑別效果及時間穩定性。結果顯示這四種模式都有分類架構上的缺失，其中Newcomb和Bukowski（1983）與Coie和Dodge（1988）模式是較佳的分類方法；另外研究者也針對此二種模式提出若干修正，提供實際運用的參考。

The purpose of this study was to investigate advantages and disadvantage of four two-dimensional classified system of sociometric status had proposed by Peery（1979）, Coie, Coppotelli an Dodge（1982）, Newcomb and Bukowski（1983） and Coie and Dodge（1988）. 154 third- and fifth-grade children served as subjects at three time-intervals during four months. It explored the discriminant validity and temporal stability of four classified models. The results indicated that none of these was a perfect classified scheme, so we proposed some modifications. The models of Newcomb and Bukowski（1983）and Coie and Dodge（1988）were the better choices.