本研究目的在探討?同?激對男子上肢肌?表現之影響。?同?激型態分為：阻??激（80%的最大負荷?進?4次反覆）、震動式阻??激（80%的最大負荷?進?10秒的震動?激）?種實驗處?方式，共選取24位大專健康男性?與實驗並?用??計校正震動頻?和測?肌?指?之相關??，將所得資?以相依樣本單因子變??分析比較基礎值、阻??激及震動式阻??激三種方式差?情況。結果：在初始最大??、發??以及反應時間??上，震動式阻??激及阻??激與基礎值間達顯著差?(p<.05)，而震動式阻??激與阻??激?種方式之間任何??並未達顯著差?。結?：受試者在接受本研究所設計之震動式阻??激和阻??激?種?激型態皆能增加上肢肌?表現，但震動式阻??激對激發肌?表現（初始最大??、發??及反應時間）並?會產生?好的效果。

Graduate Institute of Physical Education, National Ping Tung University of Education This study examined the effects of the different stimulation types for men's strength performance of the upper limbs. There were two different stimulation types: the resistant stimulation [RS] (4 repetition×80% maximum), and the vibratory stimulation [VS] (10sec, 80% maximum). Using the load cell calibrated the frequency of vibration and measured pulling force curves in the two different stimulations (i. e., RS and VS) on 24 healthy college male subjects. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures was applied for statistic analysis. The RS, VS, and basic values [BV] were significantly different on the initial maximal force, the rate force of development, and the reaction time (p＜.05). However, there is no significant difference between VS and RS. In conclusion, the upper limbs of strength performance increased after accepting VS or RS, but VS did not have better effects than RS.