文章詳目資料

大專體育學刊 TSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 臺灣、大陸全運會和東亞運會田徑成績之比較分析
卷期 8:4
並列篇名 A Comparative Study of the Performance of Athletes among the Taiwan National Sports Meet, the China National Sports Meet and the South East Asian Games
作者 劉淑華
頁次 79-89
關鍵字 田賽項目徑賽項目成績差異Field eventsTrack eventsGrades differenceTSSCI
出刊日期 200612

中文摘要

目的:比較臺灣94?全國運動會及大?第十屆全國運動會和第四屆澳門東亞運會之間的田徑成績差?情形。方法:本研究採用描述統計和單因子變??分析考驗顯著水準。?達顯著水準,再以薛費氏法進?各項目的事後比較。結果:一、男子組跳高、撐竿跳高、三級跳遠、鉛球、鐵餅和標槍等田賽項目,皆達顯著差?水準(p<.01);而跳遠和鏈球項目,未達顯著差?。二、男子組100公尺、400公尺、1,500公尺、5,000公尺、10,000公尺、110公尺跨?、400公尺跨?、3,000公尺障礙和400公尺接?等徑賽項目,皆達顯著差?水準(p<.01);但在200公尺、800公尺、1,600公尺和混合運動等項目,則未達顯著差?。三、?子組撐竿跳高、跳遠、三級跳遠、鉛球、鐵餅、鏈球和標槍等田賽項目,皆達顯著差?水準(p<.01);但跳高項目則未達顯著差?。四、?子組100公尺、200公尺、400公尺、1,500公尺、5,000公尺、10,000公尺、400公尺跨?、400公尺接?、1,600公尺接?和混合運動等徑賽項目,皆達顯著差?水準(p<.01);而800公尺和100公尺跨?項目,則未達顯著差?。結?:依據結,本研究認為大?全運會成績均優於東亞運會,臺灣全運會除男子組1,500公尺和10,000公尺?個項目優於東亞運會成績之外,其它東亞運會競賽成績則優於臺灣全運會。再者,過去我們認為的短、跨項目是本國強項,最具有奪牌實?,但本文發現能?代謝是以乳酸系統與有氧系統為主的中、長距?,亦具競爭的潛在實?,在亞洲還有表現空間,由此觀之,本國的田徑發展或可在這些項目上進?有計劃的系統培訓。

英文摘要

This study examined the grade differences in track and field events among Taiwan's 2005 National Sports Meet, China's 10th National Sports Meet and 4(superscript th) South East Asian Games 2005 in Macau. It used mainly description statistics and independent and one-way ANOVA to examine each event's significance level, then compaing it again with Scheffe's method if the number obtains the significance level afterwards. This study obtained findings as follows. First, the numbers for men's field events such as high jump, pole vault, triple jump, shot put, discus and javelin all reached the significance level (p< .01); however, the numbers for long jump and hammer throw were below it. Second, the numbers for men’s track events such as the 100-meter, 400-meter, 1500-meter, 5000-meter, 10000-meter, 110-meter hurdles, 400-meter hurdles, 3000-meter steeplechase, and the 400-meter relay all obtained the significance level (p< .01) as well. The numbers for the 200-meter, 800-meter, 1600-meter relay and decathlon did not reach the significance level. Third, the numbers for women's field events including pole vault, long jump, triple jump, shot put, discus, hammer throw and javelin all came to the significance level (p< .01), while the high jump failed to reach it. Fourth, the numbers for women's track events including 100-meter, 200-meter, 400-meter, 1500-meter, 10000-meter, 400-meter hurdles, the 400-meter relay, the 1600-meter relay and decathlon all achieved the significance level (p< .01). However, 800-meter and 100-meter hurdles were lower than it. The research has concluded that China's 10th National Sports Meet had better grades than the 4th South East Asian Games 2005 in Macau. Although Taiwan's 2005 National Sports Meet was graded better than the 4th South East Asian Games 2005 in Macau in 1500-meter and 10000-meter, all other records from the latter were higher than those of the former. It was widely believed in the past that we had odds-on sprint and hurdle events; however, this research strongly recommends that further systematical developments should be on the middle-distance events, in which metabolism is largely based on the lactic acid system and the aerobics system.

相關文獻