本研究目的有五：一、瞭解過去綜合活動學習領域課程評鑑規準的內涵及特性，作為編製本評鑑規準的依據。二、編製「國中綜合活動課程評鑑規準」，以提供綜合活動教師選用教材或自編教材的參考依據。三、分析「國中綜合活動課程評鑑規準」信效度考驗的結果，讓本評鑑規準更具有效性。四、撰寫「國中綜合活動課程評鑑規準」的補充說明，讓本評鑑規準的內容更清楚易懂。五、比較本研究評鑑規準與過去評鑑規準的異同，以顯示本評鑑規準的特色。研究對象有二：一、訪談對象6位，訪談一和訪談二分別訪談3位綜合活動教師，前者瞭解教師對綜合活動認知理解的情形，後者瞭解教師對本研究評鑑規準補充說明的意見；二、課程評鑑者240位教師，進行問卷資料的蒐集，以瞭解本研究之評鑑規準的信效度結果，也從問卷的開放式問題中蒐集教師的意見，作為本研究之評鑑規準補充說明的依據。研究方法採用內容分析、訪談、問卷以及統計分析等方法。本研究得到幾點結論：一、過去有些綜合活動課程評鑑規準較忽略「教學活動」與「教學評量」的重要，且缺乏信效度資料；二、本研究評鑑規準評鑑指標同時具有評鑑教科書及自編教材的功能；三、本研究評鑑規準提供信效度資料，可供教師進行量化的評鑑；四、本研究評鑑規準提供的「補充說明」不僅幫助教師瞭解評鑑內容且使用方便；五、本研究評鑑規準具有教導教師瞭解綜合活動課程理念的功能。根據上述研究結果提出討論，並據以提出建議，作為學校教師教學實務以及未來研究之參考。

The purposes of this study were：(1) to clarify the contents and characteristics of the past curriculum evaluation criteria of Integrative Activity Courses as a basis to develop a new curriculum evaluation criteria；(2) to compile a new Curriculum Evaluation Criteria of Junior High School Integrative Activity Courses as a guideline for teachers in their choosing or preparing for teaching materials；(3) to get reliability and validity data, and to make the criteria more efficient；(4) to devise an epexegesis for the Curriculum Evaluation Criteria of Junior High School Integrative Activity Courses to make it more understandable；(5) to compare the past curriculum evaluation criteria of Integrative Activity Courses with the one proposed here in order to clear up the characteristics of this new Criteria.The subjects comprised two categories：(1) 6 interviewees, who were Integrative Activity Course teachers. Three were interviewed with the purpose of realizing their perception of the present Integrative Activity Courses, while the other three were asked for their suggestions about the epexegesis of the Criteria; (2) 240 teachers, who were administered a questionnaire in order to collect reliability and validity data of the Criteria, and to understand their opinions about the Criteria. Their opinions constitute the basis of devising the epexegesis. The researcher adopted content analysis, interview, questionnaire, and statistics analysis methods. The results showed that：(1) some of the past Integrative Activity Course curriculum evaluation criteria ignored the importance of the “ teaching activities” and “Instructional Assessment”, and lacked reliability and validity data; (2) this new Evaluation Criteria may be used to evaluate textbooks and self-made teaching materials; (3) this Evaluation Criteria contains reliability and validity data; (4) the Epexegesis may help teachers understand the contents of evaluation and is easy to use; and (5) this Evaluation Criteria is useful in teaching teachers to understand the rationale of Integrated Activity Course construction. Finally, the researcher discussed the results and has provided some suggestions for teaching practice and future research.