本文旨在說明，西方學界對於列斐伏爾空間生產論概念三元組 (空間實踐、
空間再現和再現空間) 的幾種演繹方式，並以新近的理論取向來加以引申和修
正。首先，列斐伏爾的空間生產概念三元組中蘊含著二元張力，但二元張力位居
何處，則有不同看法，分別可以葛瑞哥里和索雅的詮釋為代表。哈維則以空間性
質的三種存有論，來與列斐伏爾的概念三元組交錯，值得藉此發展成為以關係和
過程為核心的多重辯證觀點，來理解列斐伏爾的概念三元組。其次，本文引申空
間實踐的概念，運用紀登斯的結構二元性觀點，指出空間實踐可以理解為結構和
行動的相互構成，並援引行動者–網絡理論和操演概念，來補充列斐伏爾空間生
產論中較乏討論的能動性課題，提出網絡與操演的二元性。第三，針對空間再現
和再現空間這組概念所暗含的抽象與具體、支配與從屬∕抵抗的對照性意涵，本
文主張予以一般化和政治化，形成空間再現之政治和再現空間之政治的觀點，並
討論空間再現含納的知識和意識形態二元性，以及再現空間概念含納的身體和想
像二元性，然後分別與傅柯的知識∕權力觀念，以及拉岡的真實、象徵和想像三
界域的區分對話。最後，本文提出須回到社會–空間的歷史地理時勢，尤其是列
斐伏爾提出的從抽象空間到差異空間的社會轉化，來看待空間生產論的分析價
值。

This article provides an exploration into Henri Lefebvre’s conceptual triad in production of space - spatial practice, representations of space, and spaces of representation - and tries to supplement and revise it with new theoretical approaches.
Firstly, the dialectical tensions in the conceptual triad are identified through Gregory,Soja and Harvey’s elaborations on Lefebvre’s formula, leading to a view of “dialectics in multitude” that lay emphasis on relation and process. Secondly, the author applies concepts from Giddens’ structuration theory, Butler’s performativity, and actor-network theory on spatial practice to focus on the dialectical tension between
structure and agency. Thirdly, the two often dichotomized concepts of
“representations of space” and “spaces of representation” are both generalized as fields for political struggle, and expounded as having their own dialectical tensions which are knowledge-ideology and body-imagination respectively. Finally, the author argues that the conceptual triad of production of space must be put into historical-geographical context to realize its analytical and strategic values.