本研究主要目的:

一、探討國內男女體操裁劑的評審分數是否客觀和一致。
二、比較探討這兩屆體操比賽的男女兩組裁對員，在分數的鉤定上，是否趨向一致，何者較為客觀。

次要目的:

一、探討國內最近男女體操選手的水準。
二、探討男女各單項決賽，五位裁飼之和或中間三位裁判之和的平均數及有敷分數，對名次的影響。
三、探討男女各項目的裁鉤，其評定最高及最低分數的次數。

本研究以中華民國64年(1975 )在台北市舉行的第二屆台萬區運動會競技體操比賽(男選手單槓、雙槓、吊環、鞍馬、地板與跳馬人數均為48人，女選手高低槓、平衡木、地板與跳馬人數均為59人)，與中華民國67年(1978)在台南市舉行的第五屆台灣區運動會競技體操比賽(男選手單槓44人，雙損47人，吊環46人，鞍馬47人，地板47人，跳馬47人，女選手高低槓、平衡木、地板與跳馬人數均為4人)，各單項男女裁判所評審分數的原國立台灣師範大學林清和始資料作為研究對象與範圍。

獲得資料，使用皮爾遜積差相關法(Pea-rson Product-moment Correlation) 興未相關的r之間的差異公式(Differencebetween uneorrelation r's)來做檢定比較，並經分析與討論 後獲得下列結論:

一、國內男女體操裁判，對分數的評定，仍有部分的差異存在。各單項各審裁判所評審分數與有教分數的相關係數，可用來判別各裁判評分的客觀性。
二、兩屆比賽中，民國67年的男女裁夠對規定動作的評審分數較客觀於民國64年的男女裁判，在自選動作的分數夠定上，兩屆男女裁判員，其客觀性的差異不顯著。
三、兩屆比賽中，不論規定動作或自選動作，民國67年的男女項目裁鈍，其內部評審觀點較民國64年的男女項目裁判，趨向一致。
四、在兩屆比賽中，男女各單項的主任裁 判，評審分數都較其他裁對客觀，且差異非常顯著(p< 0001 )。
五、目前國內男子競技體操各單項的平均水準是:地板與跳馬兩項約在7.00分左右，單槓與雙槓兩項約在5.00分左右，吊環與鞍馬兩項約在3.00分左右。女子各單項平均水準:地板約在7.00分左右，平衡木與跳馬兩項約在6.00分左右，高低槓約在5.00分左右。
六、在各單項決賽中，以有按分數決定名次時，若產生並列情形，可用居中三位分數之平均數來解決並列情形，若無法消除，再用全部五位裁對所評審分數之平均數來決定，必可解決名次並列之弊，且能產生明確的變化，供做決定名次時的參考。
七、對男女各單項裁判，所評審分數為最高或最低的次數加以統計，除了瞭解是否有人習於評出最高或最低分數外，尚可做為目前國內延請裁判的參考。

Principal purpose of this research:

1.To investigate whether the scores given by judges of domestic male and female gymnasties are objective and consistent or not.
2. To compare and to investigate whether the judges of male team and female team of the two gymnastics contests tend to be consistent is score giving， and which is more objective.

Secondaηpurposes:

1. To investigate the recent level of male and female gymnasts in our country.
2. To investigate the influence of average given by five judges or middle three judges or effactive scores (the two middle scores) on
the standings in the final of each male or female contest.
3. To calculate the number of times about judge's giving the highest and lowest score in each male or female contest.

The subjectand scope of this researeh Ls based on the original data of score given by judge of each male or female contest of gymnastics in the 1975's 2nd Taiwan DistrictGames held at τ'aipeiCity (48 gymnasts for horizontal bar， parallel bars,still rings,pommel horse, floor exercise and vaulting respectively in male contest; 59 gymnasts for uneven bars,
balance beam， floor exercise and vaulting respectively in female contest) and the 1978、5th Taiwan DistrictGames held at Tainan City (44 gymnasts for horizontal bar， 47 for parallel bars， 46 for still rings， 47 for pommel horse， 47 for floor exercise， 47 for vaulting in male
contest; 49 gymnasts for uneven bars， balance beam， floor exercise and vaulting respectiv in female contest). Having got the data,made the test and comparison by Peareons Product--Moment Correlation and Difference Between UNcorrelation r's, analyzed and discussed,we come to the following conclusions:

1. There are some differences among the scores the scores given by judges of each stage in each contest can be used for judging the objectivity of score given by each judge.

2. In the two games， the score given by male an of the highest or lowest score given by
and female judges of 1978 are more objective than that of 1975 in compulsory exercise. As
objectivity of score given by male and female judges of the two games is not significant.

3. In the two games， regardless of compulsory exercise oroptional exercise,
thedomestic evaluation of 1978's judges for male and female contests has more tendency
of being consistent than that of 1975's judges for male and female contests.

4. In the two games，the score given by the chief chief judge of each male or female
contest is more objective than that given by other judges ; and the difference is very
significant(p<0.01).

5. At present， the average standard of each item item of male gymnastics in our country
are: score about 7:00 for floor exercise and vaulting , score about 5.00 for horizontal
bar and parallel bars，score about 3.00 for still rings and pommel horse. Average standard
of each item of female gymnastics are: score about 7.00 for floor exercise，score about
6.00 for balance beam and vaulting , score about 5.00 for uneven bars.

6. In each final, if there is equivalence when the standing is decided according to
effective score, it may be resolved by adopting the average of score given by middle three
persons. If the equivalence still exists, it shall be decided according to the score
given by all of the harm of equal standing,and can produce clear and definite change for
reference of the next games.

7. To make statistics for the unmber of times of the highest or lowest score glven by judges
of each male or female contest, not only can let us understand whether there is somebody to
be accustomed to giving highest or lowest score, but also can be the refernece for inviting
and appointion judges in our country at present.