篇名 | 國族想像的權力邏輯--試論五O年代流亡主體、公領域、與現代性之間的可能關係 |
---|---|
卷期 | 36 |
並列篇名 | The Logic of Power in Imagining the Nation-State:Diaspora, Public Sphere, and Modernity in Fifties Taiwan |
作者 | 趙彥寧 |
頁次 | 037-083 |
關鍵字 | 國家權力 、 異性之愛 、 顯影 、 雙重逆反 、 魚眼 、 科技 、 現代性 、 state power 、 heterosexual love 、 develop 、 redoubled inversion 、 fisheye lens 、 technology 、 modernity 、 THCI 、 TSSCI |
出刊日期 | 199912 |
本文分析五0年代公共領域中的敘事,以闡釋流亡情境與國家權力峙的關係0分析的文本包括隨國府來台之中國流亡者的自傳、政治受難者回憶錄、反共文學、報紙新閥、及檢肅匪諜的政府文告。結論為,一,流亡者常籍由一代表「美好的過去」之物,以闡釋本質虛無的「當下」;二,I女性」對流亡者、及反共文 室,均佔特殊之地位:對前者,「母親」的象徵意義被等同於「故鄉」;對者,「女匪謀」則被建構為共匪「不可自抑」的邪惡的代表。
Through analyzing cultural texts such as political propaganda, policies regarding and works of popular literature (as officially coined “antiCommunist literature" [jangongnx]or“literature and arts of comba ting" [zhandouωenyi]), as well as personal files of military personnel, this paper seeks to highlight linkages between exercise of state power, construction of public culture, and ramification of modernity in the fifties Taiwan - an era that is commonly termed that of“White Terror_" In particular, it attempts to show these linkages as manifested in the constitution of the diasporic subjectivity_ Itargues that, through certain specific means on both levels of individual and collective identification, the diasporic subject of the fifties could manage to suture itself with the hegemonic state power, and the state could possibly imaginp- itself as the only legitimate representative of both mainland China and Taiwan_ Of particular interest in this paper are means of “fisheyelens by detour of technology" and that of“developing pure evil through heterosexuality: as both coined by the author. In the former case, by detour of visions mediated through "modern technology,\" especially that should theoretically bring about continually accumulative product in terms of either life (such as that involved in constructing the Central Cross-Island Highway) or death (such as that of military forces), the grandeur of the state could be turned into spectacle and then identified by its subjects_ In the latter case, by positing heterosexuality as the predicate of both virtue and authenticity, the pure evil of Communism could be made representable.