勞工問題一定得陷在工具主義政治的條框中嗎?我不以為然。為什麼勞工不能也成為激進地改變這個世界的一個主角呢?假如這個問題不被排除的話，那麼如何可能呢?針對這些問題，尼采提供了豐富的對話基礎。他對於現代性、集體、與妒恨政治的批判，以及他對一種以激進美學教育為核心的個人自我教育計畫的提出，很可以幫助工違反省自身的目的(與手段)問題。位管尼采對於社會，隘的輕視不是沒有問題，但是尼采對那些將個體性化約到社會性的計畫的批判，1t於任何認﹒真於培力政治和串串化政治的人而言，別是不能不面對的。

This paper problematizes the prevailing instrumentalist conception of labor movement by bringing the labor question into the purview of empowerment politics. This paper holds that Nietzsche's critique of mOdernity should provide rich resources for labor movement to reflect upon its goals and means. An aesthetically mediated radical self·education project is vital for individual workers (and， for this matter， social movement participants) to break the institutionalized routines and the unreflected binding norms on which captialism and the power that be rely. Despite Nietzsche's downright contempt for the social··which is highly problematic too， the Nietzschean caveat is precisely the irreducibility of the individual to the soical.