本文是作者近年來對。「在台灣的人類學諸歷史」進行重請與再思考的初步總結。旨在於針對日本組氏地人類學「台灣研究j及其「次東方學主義」一一特別是關於原住氏的論詰一一進行批判的反省與解構;這個總結為作者對漢人國族人類學進行童讀與再評價提供了反省的基礎。文章首先對東方學主義反省之闕如的現象提出質疑;次就漢人國族人類學對日本處氏地人類的認同加以解構。在丈誌重構的基礎上，文章也對日本強民地人類學的政。經理脈與論詰構造粗加分析，從而對日本次帝國困局及其倆手闊的「學術潮流」試作理脈敏感的理解。丈末，作者以芝加哥大學史多護教授四十年來在「人類學歷史」上的論詰踐行為例，與新生的台灣殖氏地人類學、台灣國旅人類學之歷史研究及其核殖民踐行互恃互勉。

This paper is the frist installment of a larger res each project which aims at re-reading and re-thinking the Anthropological discourses-specially those on the 、borigines"-onTaiwan_ The project attempts to initiate a deconstruction as well as an alternative narration of the discipline's past， historically and politically. Based on the observation of the amazing lack of reflexion on Orientalism-both in Japan and in Taiwan一， the paper firstly identified the collusive nature of the Han-nationaWst) Anthropology vis-a-vis its predecessor.， i.e. the Japanese Colonial Anthropology. In a context-sensitive fashion， the paper seeks to analyze the politico-economic conditions and discursive imparatives involved in the various phases of an anthropological exercise of imperial otherization/ appropriation. Reviewing the career of George Stocking's works on histories of American Anthropology， the author suggests that a more self-reflexive and context-sensitive approach be incorporated into the newly devol oping studies of Japanese Colonial Anthropology and deconstruction of Han-nationaWst) Anthropology in Taiwan.