本文討論幾項作者以及研究伙伴在過去三年田野研究中所關心的切身肉題:經驗與書寫的禁制;涉及秘密的知識罪咎;研究者身份與意圓的呈現;侵考巳隱私權的考量;研究結呆的可能傷害;研究者與贊助者的關你;多重忠誠責任剖矛盾街突。這些問題在民族誌學術文獻中很少受到討論，1ir常以邊緣或側背的文類出現。本文的論點是，這些問題既非獨特也非瑣碎，其隱晦沈寂或許指向了=社會與學術社群中文配性的識框，值得反身探討。簡言之，本文企閩尋求這一系列提問方式的被認可，種釀持續的討論。

This article reflects on several questions emerged as acute concern in author's fieldwork: the outlawed experience and the prohibited writing; the presentation of identity in the fidd; secrecy and the right of privacy recon· sidered; the moral calculation of possible harms; the risky relations between the researcher and the sponsor; the conflicting commands of multiple loy· alties. The article argues that these questions are neither idiosyncratic nor trivial. Their rarely being discussed in Taiwan's academic literature bespeaks the un·examined frames of ethnographic study. The article strives for the rec· ognition of these questions as problematic and pushes toward further discusslOn