本文旨在檢視現有主流規劃理論與結構主義規劃理論的論述，並指出它們的共同論述缺失:在於忽略了歷史發展與空間的實質討論與觀念化。為彌補這項缺失，本文於是整合新近發展的調節理論與空間理論的論述，嘗試建構發展史觀(調節主義)的規劃理論。本文指出在資本主義發展的歷史上，一個健康的發展模式是建構在空間形式與累積機制、社會調解、以及霸權集團，產生和諧的接合與一致的運作。然而，空間形式之能與累積機制、社會調解、以及霸權集團，產生和諧的接合與一致運作，卻是國家空間調節機制的一個政經策略性施為的結果。

The paper is purported to examine discourses of mainstream planning theories and structuralist planning theories and points out their common weaknesses in downplaying the two perspectives of historical development and space. With an aim to redeem this downplaying， the article subsequently makes an effort to construct a development historicalist (regulationist) planning theory by integrating the arguments of regulation theory and spatial theory developed recently. Itis suggested that formulation of a healthy development mode in capitalist development history is overwhelmingly dependent on the coherent articulation and performance of spatial form with other institutional forms including a∞umulation regime， social regulation， hegemonic blocs， while the coherent articulation and performance are a strategic result of spatial regulation regime manipulated by the state.