當城際競爭隨著全球城市（區域）的發展而日漸被激化的當下，企業型城市的治理模式開始
逐漸被視為競爭導向新都市政治模式中的重要制度工程，以激勵並帶動都市成長動能。自從
Harvey對於所謂的都市企業主義的概念進行評析以來，隨著近20年來都市政治經濟理論化進程的
演進，企業型都市治理的論述已跳脫出侷限在都市成長機器乃至於都市政權的成長導向地方政治
經濟分析，更進一步被接合空間再尺度化過程中衍伸的不同層級治理實體的政經權力對抗，以及
國家機器與不同空間尺度相互糾結的複雜社會空間關係上進行討論。在面對大量以西方後福特主
義城市經驗為主軸所充斥的都市發展政治文本當下，本文嘗試以臺北市近年來的企業型都市治理
做為基礎，探討其在特殊的兩岸三地連結、中央地方關係以及城際競爭下所衍生的空間尺度間的
角力，以及在不同層級國家機器（如中央、地方）地緣政治影響下所制約的空間策略選擇機制對
其企業型都市治理模式所產生的影響做一討論，進而與西方都市治理經驗中的都市企業主義進行
對話。

While the phenomena of intercity competition has been intensified because of the emergence of
global city(-region) system, entrepreneurial urban governance has been taken as an important
institutional engineering in accordance with the competition- oriented new urban politics. Since the
critical review of urban entrepreneurialism by David Harvey, the discourse of entrepreneurial urban
governance, with the approach of urban political economy during the latest two decades, has been
gradually transformed from the power structure of local political economy based on urban growth
machine and urban regime to the interscalar power contestation within the framework of spatial
rescaling as well as the mechanism of spatial selectivity by state apparatus in response to emerging
glocalization. While the contemporary political context of urban governance is full of Western
Post-Fordist urban experiences, the paper tries to take the pathway of Taipei’s global city formation
as an example to explore the ad hoc interscalar contestation due to cross-strait political tension,
asymmetric intergovernmental relationships, and vicious intercity competition. In addition, the paper
also attempts to explore the institutional constrains of mechanism of spatial selectivity driven by
central state to Taipei’s entrepreneurial governance capacity and take a experience conversation of
different developmental pathway between Taipei and the prototypical Post-Fordist Western cities.