篇名 | 論陳建《學蔀通辨》之貢獻與失誤 |
---|---|
卷期 | 36 |
並列篇名 | Some Observations on Chen Chien's the Clarification of the Veiled Theories(Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien): It's Merits and Flaws |
作者 | 蔡龍九 |
頁次 | 149-191 |
關鍵字 | 學蔀通辨 、 道一編 、 朱子晚年定論 、 朱陸異同 、 朱陸調和 、 The clarification of the veiled theories 、 Hsueh-pu-tung-pien 、 The later chu hsi 、 The conclusion 、 Chu-tzu-wan-nien-ting-lun 、 The way is one 、 Tao-i-pien 、 The similarities and dissimilarities between chu and lu 、 Reconciliation and combination of chu and lu 、 THCI |
出刊日期 | 200810 |
本文探究《學蔀通辨》對於《朱子晚年定論》、《道一編》等傾向於朱陸調和之作品,所提出的批評內容。分別探討《學蔀通辨》中的合理處與失誤處,並說明理由,以及此書批評效果。最後,衡定《學蔀通辨》,並總結此書的貢獻及失誤,依此反省「朱陸異同」之爭論,是否有更清晰的處理方式。
This paper aims to explore Chen Chien's The clarification of the Veiled Theories (Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien), specifically his comments on Wang Yang-ming's The Later Chu Hsi: The Concusion (Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun) and Cheng Min-cheng's The Way Is One (Tao-I-Pien), which according to Chen, suffer from the same fault of reconciling and combining Chu Hsi and Lu Hsiang-shan. I will begin with a thorough investigation on Chen's comments, sorting out as well as explaining the book's merits and flaws, and weight its intended effect. I endeavor to reevaluate this book in the hope of bring out a more constructive perspective on the issues concerning the reflections on the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu.