本研究旨在探討國中生關係攻擊加害者與受害者，相較於未涉入關係攻擊者，在關係攻擊規範信念、同理心，以及人際衝突因應策略上的異同。本研究以台北縣、市4 所八年級學生為研究對象，共計964 人（男生498 人、女生466 人）。使用的研究工具包括：「關係攻擊同儕提名問卷」、「關係攻擊受害經驗量表」、「同理心量表」及「規範信念與人際衝突因應策略情境式量表」。調查所得資料以描述性統計、卡方考驗、單因子變異數分析，以及多元逐步迴歸等統計方法處理。結果發現：一、在關係攻擊規範信念，關係攻擊受害者得分高於未涉入者，加害者與未涉入者間沒有差異；二、在同理心，關係攻擊受害者的得分高於未涉入者，加害者與未涉入者間沒有差異；三、在人際衝突因應策略，關係攻擊加害者與受害者在「負面情緒與自責」及「發洩情緒」因應策略上皆高於未涉入者；受害者在「尋求社會支持」策略上高於未涉入者，在「負面情緒與自責」策略上高於關係攻擊加害者；四、國中生的關係攻擊規範信念、同理心及人際衝突因應策略，可以有效預測其關係攻擊加害及受害程度。

The main purpose of this study was to investigate how the relationally aggressive and the relationally victimized adolescents differed from their counterparts of nonrelational-aggression-involvement in terms of normative beliefs, empathy, and interpersonal coping strategies. The sample consisted of 964 8th-grade students (498 boys and 466 girls) from four junior high schools in Taipei area. The instruments used in this study were Relational Aggression Questionnaire-Peer Nomination, Victimization Experiences of Relational Aggression-Self Report Scale, The Interpersonal Reactivity Inventory, and The Questionnaire of Normative Beliefs about Relational Aggression and Interpersonal Coping Strategies. The data were analyzed by Chi-square, ANOVA, and Multiple Stepwise Regression.The main findings of this study were as follows: The relational victims were different from their counterparts of non-relational-aggression-involvement in terms of their normative beliefs, empathy, and the coping strategies. The relational aggressors, in contrast with the counterparts, were only dissimilar on some of the coping strategies. Overall, the variables of normative belief, empathy, and interpersonal coping strategy could predict the extent of relational aggression and relational victimization among junior-high-school students.