主撫包照詩的負面批評，在現代學者論述中頗多著墨，不但低眨其作品，甚 而非議其人格。若考察其論點，大多與「險俗」說、「休鮑」論有關，前者本 於鍾嶸{詩品} ，後者出自顏延之，承其說者在解釋上極為紛岐，亦多互為牽 連。然而，在文學史上大致文多認定鮑照是繼顏延之、謝靈運之後劉宋主要的 詩人，故宜當有辨。 本文將探索「休鮑」論、「險俗」說的立論取向及其衍生的解釋問題，辨 析古來罣撫包照詩持負面批評的主要論點。力求正本清源，希望有助於化解有關 鮑照詩批評上的爭議，並給予較為合理的評價。

A number of modern scholars have been highly critical of Bao Zhao's poetry, many of them directing their condemnation not only at his poetry, but at his personal character as wel l. Most of criticism of Bao Zhao is influenced by of the appraisal in Zhong Rong's Shi Pin (Poetry Gradings) 。fBao Zhao , using the term “ Xian Su" ( 險俗) and Yan Yan-zhi's use ofthe term “ Xiu Bao." ( 体鮑) (referring to the poetic style of Bao Zhao and Tang Hui-xiu). A number of variations have proliferated from these critical stances , many of them interrelated and none in complete agreement However, in general , Bao Zhao has been generally recognized as an important poet of Liu Song Dynasty in literary history behind Yan Yanzhi and Xie Lingyun. This study will explore the theoretical ideas behind Xiu Bao and Xian Su, and problems that derive from divergent evolution along these theoretical lines , while analyzing the major points of negative criticism against Bao Zhao's poetry. The study will do its best to thoroughly rework and begin to resolve the critical disputes over ofBao Zhao's poems, and ulti mately oHer a more reasonable evaluation.