「經禮三百，曲禮三千」向為學者闡述禮學結構、體系的依蟬，歷來對此旬的詮釋亦十分豐富。本文嘗試以引領學界的鄭玄與朱于學說作為切入點，依次辨析與楠討鄭玄「經禮為{周禮}，曲禮為H主禮}J、朱熹「經禮搞成套 之儀式，曲禮為細小儀節」二干矗兌法，並指出其影響。然後，基於〈懂禮〉作者、成書年代的不同認知，筆者根蟑「經禮三百，曲禮三千」的原文脈絡，並省視相關說法，考察「經禮三百，曲禮三千」的含義。最後，貝IJ說明(禮器)原文與注釋異說所且有的重要性。

Scholars often explain and construct the theory of Chinese etiquette wi th the phrase“Jingli sanbai， quli sanqian"， which has many interpretations. This paper first focuses on two authoritative interpretations， one given by Zheng Xuan and the other by Zhu Xi， in attempt to explain respectively their differences and effects. When solving the problems of the two statements about the real author and publication year， this paper explores the meaning of this phrase through an analysis of the phrase's context and other related exegetic materials. The importance of the phrase in Classic of Rites and their different exegeses is discussed in the end.