篇名 | 中華民國物理治療學會物理治療成果評量研究計劃得獎著作:冰凍肩患者物理治療評估表之臨床實用性 |
---|---|
卷期 | 25:3 |
並列篇名 | Tests of Physical Therapy Assessment Form for Patients with Frozen Shoulders |
作者 | 林居正 、 曹昭懿 、 吳英黛 |
頁次 | 157-168 |
關鍵字 | 評估表 、 冰凍肩 、 物理治療 、 信度分析 、 成果評量 、 Assessment form 、 Frozen shoulder 、 Physical therapy 、 Reliability 、 Outcome measurement 、 TSCI |
出刊日期 | 200005 |
背景與目的:為了協助物理治療支付制度之架構及標準,建立疾患適當之評估表是有需要的。本研究以修正之德菲法(modified Delphi method)設計冰凍肩病患之評估表格,測試其專家效度及信度,並檢驗此評估表是否可反應冰凍肩病患之療程及各階段之療效。方法:23位資深骨科物理治療師協助設計評估表,最後有18位參與評估表之效度評估,其中14位(78%)同意評估表之設計,4位(22%)認為評估表有1個以上的項目需要修改。14位冰凍肩病患,接受1位物理治療師以本研究最後修訂之量表連續2次評估(間隔小於3天),及接受另一位物理治療師評估,做為評估表測試者內及測試者間之信度分析。結果:除了肩胛骨外滑度測試者內及測試者間信度值略微偏低(分別為0.61及0.66),其他項目均有良好測試者內及測試者間信度值(0.85-0.99)。33位冰凍肩病患完成評估表之追蹤分析,22位接受3次評估、5位接受4次評估、6位接受5次評估,冰凍肩病患之物理治療評估總分在26星期內由31-46分進步到停止物理治療的78-84分(p<0.01)。結論:此評估表有良好之信、效度,而且可以反應出冰凍肩病患接受物理治療之進步情形,可作為評估療效的依據。
Background and Purposes: It is important to establish a comprehensive assessment form for patients who receive physical therapy services in the era of managed care and evidence based medicine. This study was conducted to (1) develop a physical therapy assessment form for frozen shoulder using modified Delphi method; (2) examine its validity and reliability; and (3) investigate the responsiveness of this assessment form. Methods: Twenty-three senior physical therapists were invited to develop a physical therapy assessment form for frozen shoulder. Eighteen of them (78%) went through the expert validation process. Seventy-eight percent (14 physical therapists) agreed with this assessment form, while 22% (4 physical therapists) did not agree completely on some items of the form. Fourteen patients participated in reliability tests. One physical therapist assessed these patients twice to test intra-tester reliability. These patients were also assessed by another physical therapist at the same time for inter-tester reliability. Results: Good intra-tester and inter-tester reliability were found(ICC=O.85-0.99)in all items except scapula sliding test (inter- tester reliability=O.61, inter-tester reliability=O.66).Thirty-three patients with frozen shoulders were assessed for the responsiveness of these diseases. These patients had significant improvement from 31-46 to 78-84 in total scores on the final evaluation (p<0.01) ,which include the assessment of pain, function, scapula sliding, muscle strength, range of motion, and satisfaction according to the developed form. Conclusion: The physical therapy assessment form for frozen shoulders developed in this study can be used as a reference for evaluating physical therapy treatment outcomes.