本研究主要探討國中小行政主管的人格特質與領導方式的關係，將背景變項分為國中、國小行政主管、職別兩類，人格特質分為開放型、適切型、謹慎型等三個因素，領導方式分為高倡導高關懷、低倡導高關懷、高倡導低關懷、低倡導低關懷四個因素。分析不同背景變項的行政主管在人格特質、領導方式的差異，人格特質與領導方式之典型相關，以及人格特質對領導方式的預測作用。本研究的受試者是國中小的行政主管，經便利取樣的方式施以「基本資料調查表」、「人格特質量表」與「領導方式量表」。所得資料以描述性統計、t 考驗、單因子變異數分析、典型相關、多元迴歸進行統計分析，研究結果如下：一、國中、小行政主管在人格特質的「開放型」和「謹慎型」有顯著的差異；不同職位的行政主管在人格特質的各分量表上均未達顯著差異。二、國中、小行政主管在領導方式的「低倡導高關懷」、「高倡導高關懷」、「高倡導低關懷」向度中，有顯著的差異；不同職位的行政主管在領導方式的各分量表上均未達顯著差異。三、低倡導高關懷、高倡導高關懷、高倡導低關懷與人格特質各向度呈現正相關；謹慎型與高倡導低關懷呈正相關。四、人格特質中的「開放型」和「適切型」可以正向預測低倡導高關懷和高倡導高關懷；人格特質中的「謹慎型」和「開放型」可以正向預測高倡導低關懷；人格特質中的「開放型」可以正向預測低倡導低關懷。

This study explored the correlation between personality traits and leadership styles of administrators in elementary schools and junior high schools. This study classified personality traits as “openness to experience”, “conscientiousness”, and “agreeableness”; and classified leadership styles as “high initiating and high consideration”, “high initiating and low consideration”, “low initiating and high consideration”, and “low initiating and low consideration”. Investigating the differences between personality traits and leadership styles of administrators from different backgrounds. This study determined a correlation between personality traits and leadership styles to predict leadership styles in personality traits. One hundred forty-three elementary school and junior high school administrators were selected by convenience sampling in Taiwan. The subjects were administered according to the Basic Data Scale, Personality Trait Scale, and Leadership Style Scale. A frequency distribution, t test, one-way ANOVA, canonical correlation, and multiple regression were used for the data analysis.The findings of this research are as follows. 1. There are significant differences in “openness to experience” and “conscientiousness” of personality traits between administrators in elementary schools and junior high schools. There are no significant differences in personality traits among different positions. 2. There are significant differences in “low initiating and high consideration”, “high initiating and high consideration”, and “high initiating and low consideration” between administrators in elementary schools and junior high schools. There are no significant differences in leadership styles among different positions. 3.There is a positive correlation between “low initiating and high consideration”, “high initiating and high consideration”, “high initiating and low consideration” and personality traits. There is a positive correlation between “conscientiousness” and “high initiating and low consideration”. 4. “Openness to experience” and “agreeableness” can
positively predict “low initiating and high consideration” and “high initiating and high consideration”. “Openness to experience” and “conscientiousness” can positively predict “high initiating and low
consideration”. “Openness to experience” can positively predict “low initiating and low consideration”.