陳映真和黃皙暎分別為台灣和韓國當代的重量級作家，他們不僅是兩國重要歷史現場的實際參與者，也都以文學反映歷史變遷中的社會現實，而其文學成就同樣都獲得確立時代典型的高度評價。因此，二位作家常被拿來作為比較研究的對象，不過，目前為止有關二位作家小說的多數研究，主要著重在內容的考察上面。基於此，本文主要是從人物類型和性格、敘述方式及論述形態著手，採取文本分析方法，以考察黃皙暎《悠悠家園》和陳映真〈忠孝公園〉呈現歷史認知方式的差異。選此兩部小說作為比較對象，是因兩位作家不僅在台韓都以現實主義小說著稱，他們所關注的民眾、民族等文學議題也相當接近；兩部小說在篇幅上雖有差異，但同樣都以兩個人物的記憶再構歷史，並以從現在時間點溯回過去的倒敘方式書寫，此外，敘事結構和敘述方式也頗有類似之處。研究結果發現，黃皙暎為了突顯80年代韓國歷史的否定及批判認知，透過《悠悠家園》建構了批判性知識分子和歷史的對立，並透過這些正面人物的眼睛，探討社會變革努力的意義，同時也提出了未來價值和方向的思考；而陳映真的〈忠孝公園〉，則藉由被殖民歷史壓迫，甚至協助支配勢力成為皇民的人物，暴露殖民經驗的真相，同時提出台灣社會必須誠實面對歷史、認識過去的訴求。兩篇小說對歷史認知呈現方式的差異，也可以對應到兩國對小說所探討的歷史在認知上的差異：黃皙暎充分肯定80年代社會變革的努力，並且認為必須在此基礎上追求新的價值，以因應當今資本主義當道、高度消費社會的到來；而陳映真則對過去殖民經驗的評價暫作保留，但對台灣社會則提出必須正視自己歷史的呼籲。

As highly regarded contemporary novelists in Taiwan and Korea,
respectively, Chen Yingzhen and Hwang Sok-yong were not only involved personally in major historical events in their respective countries, but also described social reality amid historical transitions in their literary works. Their achievements in literature are highly praised for creating a classic model for the contemporary era. As a result, these two novelists often become the subjects of comparative studies. Most of the existing studies pertaining to the two novelists and their works focus on the investigation of the content.Based on this background, this study began with an exploration of the characters, their personality traits, the narrative methods and types of discourse, and adopted the textual analysis method to investigate the differences in ways to deliver historical understanding between Hwang Sok-yong’s The Old Garden and Chen Yingzhen’s Park of Loyalty and Filial Piety. While both of the novelists are known for their realist novels in Korea or Taiwan, they also share similar concerns about issues such as civilians and ethnics. Despite the difference in the length, both of the stories reconstruct history through the memories of two characters and are told backwards through flashback. Moreover, similarities can be observed in the narrative structure and methods. These similarities constitute the reasons why these two novels were chosen for a comparison.The findings revealed that Hwang Sok-yong created the opposition to history among the critical intellectuals in The Old Garden, in an attempt to highlight the rejection and critical understanding of Korean history in the eighties. He discussed the meaning of social reform through the eyes of the characters with positive qualities, while pointing out future values and a direction for future thinking. On the other hand, Chen Yingzhen’s Park of Loyalty and Filial Piety unveils the truth behind the colonial experience through the colonially oppressed characters that even go as far as to assist the oppressors in order to become Japanized. Chen also made an appeal in this novel, urging Taiwanese people to honestly face up to history and truly understand the past.The difference in ways to deliver historical understanding between the two novels is also associated with the difference in the understanding of the history referred to in the novels between the two countries. Hwang Sok-yong fully appreciated the efforts made to promote social reform in the eighties, and believed that it is necessary to pursue new values on this foundation, in order to cope with a high-consumption society dominated by capitalism. However, Chen Yingzhen restrained himself from giving any opinions about the past colonial experience while appealing to Taiwanese people to face up to their own history without prejudice.