2007 年肇因於司馬庫斯的櫸木事件，當地原住民團體「泰雅族馬里光、基那吉傳統領域聯盟」要求就其傳統領域範圍內進行共同管理，政府旋即公佈實施「原住民族地區資源共同管理辦法」，提供與原住民建立共同管理機制之法源。由於係屬初次制度創新之舉，有關如何操作細節並不詳悉，引發不少爭辯。根據Carlsson and Berkes (2005) 提出的五種共同管理方式，直指公部門政府機構、私部門地方社區和資源使用者等利害關係人之間的協力合作關係應予強化，且須基於各地之發展脈絡，協商特定區域或資源系統的管理權力和責任；本文乃參酌該論點建構分析框架，並以司馬庫斯櫸木事件為背景說明，選取新竹縣尖石鄉泰雅族馬里光、基那吉部落群為研究個案，透過文獻回顧、模型分析及個案研究的方法，探討原住民傳統領域共同管理機制之問題所在，並於最後提出政策建議，以供政府未來建構這類機制之參酌。

After the Smangus Beech Event in 2007, the local indigenous groups, Atayal
Mrqwang and Knazi Traditional Territory Association, requested the government to grant them co-management rights in their traditional territory. The government soon passed the Regulation for Co-management of Resource in Indigenous Areas, serving as a legal foundation for a co-management mechanism with indigenous people. As this was without legal precedent, details were not specified thoroughly, and many arguments ensued. According to Carlsson and Berkes’ (2005) five co-management
models, joint collaboration between public governmental agencies, private local communities, the developmental context of each region should serve as a basis for negotiating the powers and responsibilities in managing each specific area or resources system. This study references these perceptions to construct a frameswork for analysis, in which the Smangus Beech Event serves as the event in question, with the Mrqwang and Knazi sub-groups selected as study cases. Through a literature review, models analysis, and cases studies, we discuss problems in the co-management mechanism in traditional indigenous territories, and propose suggestions for the future implementation of such mechanisms by the government.