篇名 | Elderly Oropharynx-hypopharynx Carcinoma Patients: Induction Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiotherapy Improve Cancer Controls than Radiotherapy Alone |
---|---|
卷期 | 18:3 |
並列篇名 | 年長族群口咽及下咽癌:前導性化療合併同步化放療比單獨放射治療更能增進腫瘤控制 |
作者 | 張耀文 、 李文星 、 洪世凱 、 邱文彥 、 許文林 、 劉岱瑋 、 蘇裕傑 、 黃經民 、 李思錦 、 林宏益 |
頁次 | 181-192 |
關鍵字 | 口咽癌 、 下咽癌 、 放射治療 、 化學治療 、 年長 、 Oropharynx carcinoma 、 Hypopharynx carcinoma 、 Radiotherapy 、 Chemotherapy 、 Elderly 、 TSCI |
出刊日期 | 201109 |
背景:本篇研究老年口咽及下咽癌族群(以治癒為抗癌目的並且沒有接受手術的病人):探討前
導性化療合併同步化放療與單獨接受放射治療之效果比較。方法:我們回溯收集 2003 至 2007 年,組織學證實為口咽或下咽癌,年紀超過 70 歲並且沒接受手術的病人 44 位。 病人分為兩組,A 組(前導性化療加上同步化放療,n = 22)和 B 組(只放射治療,n = 22)。依病人的腫瘤位置,性別及臨床分期在兩組中使用一對一(1:1)配對分析。總共有三十六位男性及八位女性案例,年齡中位數為 76 歲(分佈範圍為 70~88 歲)。實驗的觀察標的(end point)為病人的存活率及腫瘤控制。結果:所有病人追蹤的時間中位數為 35 個月(分佈範圍為1~72 個月)。在第三年,A 組呈現比B組更好的腫瘤控制,在局部區域控制率(86.4%比36.4%,p = 0.002) 及無病生存率(61.4%比 36.4% ,p = 0.035)。然而,在疾病特異生存率及總生存率上,兩組沒有顯著差異。可以想見的是,A 組比 B 組有更多的治療副作用(Grade 3~4 的黏膜炎,63.6% 比27.3% ,p = 0.015)。結論:對沒有接受手術的老年口咽下咽癌患者來說,前導性化療合併同步化放療比起只做放射治療,明顯增進腫瘤控制率,只做放射治療應該只適合臨床上不適合做化療的病人。
Background : This study intended to compare treatment results between induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone in elderly oropharynx-hypopharynx carcinoma patients who were treated curatively and non-surgically.Methods : Between 2003 and 2007, we retrospectively included 44 histologically proven oropharynx-hypopharynx carcinoma patients who were aged more than 70 years and treated non-surgically. Two groups were defined: the group A (induction chemotherapy plus CCRT, n = 22) and the group B (RT alone, n = 22). Patients in the
group B were 1:1 match-paired to those in the group A by using three factors: cancer subsite, gender, and clinical stage. Totally, there were 36 males and 8 females, with a median age of 76 years (range, 70 – 88 years). Patient survival and cancer control were defined as study end points.Results : The median follow-up time for all patients was 35.0 months (range, 1 – 72 months). At 3 years, the group A demonstrated better cancer controls than the group B, in terms of locoregional control (86.4% versus 36.4%, p = 0.002) and disease-free survival (61.4% versus 36.4%, p = 0.035). However, no statistically significant differences
were found on disease-specific and overall survivals. Not surprisingly, more treatment-related toxicity were observed in the group A than in the group B (grade 3-4 mucositis, 63.6% versus 27.3%, p = 0.015).
Conclusions : For elderly oropharynx-hypopharynx carcinoma patients treated nonsurgically,induction chemotherapy plus CCRT significantly improves cancer control when compared with RT alone. RT alone should be reserved for patients who are medically contra-indicated to chemotherapy.