依據比較公共行政之觀點，不同的國家或政體，由於歷史文化背景、社會經濟結構、政治制度設計和組織文化特色等等方面之差異，會使得公共政策的形成與推動，出現不同之面貌。在此種情況下，當兩個特性有差異的政體進行制度化之交流合作時，其政策之形成與推動如何對接及磨合，就成爲頗值得探討之課題，也是交流合作能否達成預期目標的關鍵環節。本文嘗試將政治經濟學研究中歷史結構研究途徑和發展型國家的論述，融入比較公共行政的觀點，並以經濟部所推動之「搭橋專案」爲例，對海峽兩岸制度化交流合作機制建立和運作之情形，進行相關之比較研究，希望能發現一些促進兩岸交流合作更爲順暢有效的作法。

According to the perspective of comparative public administration, different states or polities have different patterns in formulating and implementing public policy due to differences in historical and cultural background, socio-economic structure, institutional design and organizational culture. In that context, how to joint and smooth the formulation and implementation of relevant policies by two polities with different characteristics, which are carrying out institutionalized exchange and cooperation, will be a crucial issue worth to probe. The situation of joint and interaction will definitely affect the possibility of attaining the expectative goals. This article tries to combine the perspective of comparative public administration with the arguments of the historical-structural approach and the developmental state in the study of political economy. The author will take the "Bridging Project" proposed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs as an example and probe into the mechanism of the cross-straits exchange and cooperation in terms of a comparative study on the relevant policy-makings on the both sides of the Taiwan Strait. We hope to figure Out some findings and suggestions to enhance and smooth the exchange and cooperation through the comparative study.