立法院終於三讀通過具爭議性的《安寧緩和醫療條例》改革法案（總統嗣並公布施行），這項法案僅限於消極不作為型的安樂死可以合法化，此一修法終為紛擾已久的消極安樂死找到一個暫時的解決出口，如此一來，醫生依該條例相關規定對末期病人不施行心肺復甦術，甚至終止或撤除已施行之心肺復甦術，均不會構成刑法的殺人罪或加工自殺罪，本文乃逐一解析其合法要件及法律效果。然而，更進一步的積極作為型安樂死目前並未合法化，國內反對者眾，是否能搭著上開
新修正條例的順風車，讓社會觀念能從普遍反對積極安樂死而漸漸「開化」或「轉化」為贊成多數？這是個值得一試的正確方向。本文為求拋磚引玉，爰從宗教、倫理、醫學及病人自由決定權等面向切入此議題的核心，企圖點燃戰火以理清有條件支持積極安樂死的應然。

The Legislative Yuan finally passed the third reading of a disputed reformed bill to the Hospice Palliative Care Regulation which only confine to legalization of the passive euthanasia.Th e law amendment has eventually found a temporary resolution way for the disputed passive euthanasia.He nce, in accordance with the regulation, the doctor cannot
proceed resuscitation for the terminal cancer patients, even the proceeding resuscitation being stopped or removed will not commit Crime of homicide or assistant suicide crime ruled within Criminal law.Th is essay analysis the legal condition and legal effect for the regulation one by one.H owever, the more positive Euthanasia never be admitted legally and the domestic oppositions against the legal pass of Euthanasia are relative majority.Whether the law amendment can "develop" and "convert" the majority opposition into the affirmative majority or not? This will be the right direction to examine.This essay enter
into the core of the agenda by religion, ethics, medical science and the patient right of free decision, and try to initiate a dispute in order to clarify the necessity of conditionally supporting positive Euthanasia.