文章詳目資料

軍法專刊

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 淺談虛報醫療費用與刑事詐欺罪
卷期 57:2
並列篇名 Exploring the Relationship Between the Fraudulence of Expense of National Health Insurance and the Fraud in Criminal Law
作者 王志嘉
頁次 121-142
關鍵字 虛報醫療費用詐欺罪密醫罪門前藥局未親自診察病人Keywords:Fraudulence of expense of National Health InsuranceFraud crimeUnlicensed doctorFront-door pharmacyConsulting the patients indirectly
出刊日期 201104

中文摘要

全民健康保險實施後,醫病關係由單純的雙方關係(醫師、病人)轉變成三方關係(醫師、病人、與健保局),醫師(醫療機構)在診察病人後,僅向病人收取少部分的醫療費用,多數的醫療費用係向健保局申報,因此衍生不少虛報醫療費用相關的案件。過去較少論及虛報醫療費用是否與刑法詐欺罪有關,直到2006 年11 月健保局發布「全民健康保險法第72 條規定違法案件函
送偵辦注意事項」,列舉說明「具體違法證據」的案件類型將移送司法機關偵辦,始引起注意。換藥品與多蓋健保卡等,直接與詐欺罪有關,然而「密醫罪」、「門前藥局」、與「未親自診察病人申報醫療費用」等,是否與詐欺罪有關,則顯得複雜,且少有學說及實務見解。故本文擬以改編的醫療糾紛案例,探討虛報健保醫療費用的新興類型,如「密醫罪」、「門前藥局」、以及
「未親自診察病人申報醫療費用」等,是否構成刑事的詐欺罪。

英文摘要

After the implementation of national health insurance (NHI), the doctor -
patient relationship became three-way relationship (doctor, patient, and Central National Health Insurance Bureau, NHI Bureau).The NHI Bureau afforded most medical expenses when the doctors diagnosed and treated the patients.Therefore, many fraudulence of expenses of NHI happened in recent ten years. In November, 2006, the NHI Bureau transferred the issues of fraudulence of expense of NHI to judicial institution.
Therefore, the purpose of this article is to discuss the relationships
between the fraud criminal liability, unlicensed doctor, front-door pharmacy,and consulting the patient indirectly.

相關文獻