刑法職務犯罪的類型，雖要求以公務員作為行為主體的基礎概念，但對於職務行為違反的瀆職罪類型中，行為主體資格通常會依職務犯罪的類型，而作特定的限制，並非單純僅以公務員的概念，直接作為行為主體。惟在公務員廢弛職務釀成災害罪中，雖然行為主體的要求，係以對於災害具有預防與遏止的公務員，但因災害的相對性不明確概念，連帶使得主體的特定身分要求，也形同不明確。由於廢弛職務釀成災害的問題，有日漸增多的趨勢，對於該罪構成要件該當問題的檢視，乃有其實用性的必要。

Although the crime of disobeying the duty in Criminal Law requests the
public servant to be the actor as one of the fundamental concepts, there are certain restrictions on the qualification of the actor according to the types of malfeasance related to disobeying the duty, instead of merely taking the concept of the public servant as the actor directly. However, the qualification of the actor in the crime of the public servant's neglecting the duty leading to the disaster is that the public servant should have the obligation to prevent and curb the disaster from happening, while the specific qualification about the identity of the actor is not clear due to the mutual unclear concept of the disaster. Because the problems about neglecting the duty leading to the disaster
are increasing day by day, the survey of this crime has its practicability.