近年來，府際關係的研究主題頗受台灣政治學者重視。然而，既有的文獻在分析時大多僅著重國內層次，疏於關注國際層次之制度和行為者所發揮的影響力。為增益以上不足，本文著眼於環境保護議題，研析「全球環境治理途徑」與「府際關係」兩者間的互動脈絡。筆者以「大西洋鮪魚保育國際委員會」（ICCAT）削減台灣大目鮪配額案作為分析對象，研究發現如下：首先，在全球環境治理架構中，拘束性力量的形式與來源是多元的，當事國政府必須與他國或非國家行為者協調合作，才能兼顧治理成效和國際形象。其次，台灣的海洋事務變革至今僅處於啟動階段，尚未建立夥伴關係或公民社會參與等合作機制，因此難以取得各利害關係人的共識。再者，台灣在海洋漁業法規與監督技術上雖有所改善，但就府際制度結構、教育面以及管制機制而言，尚存有改進空間。最後，全球環境治理途徑與府際關係兩者間的互動包括以下階段：環境共識凝聚與國際組織構建、環境監督、國際層次施壓、國內府際互動、以及政策與制度產出。在思考全球公共問題的解決之道時，府際關係研究應將國際層次的治理實體與制度一併納入分析範疇中，以彰顯其間的動態關係。

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in intergovernmental relations within the field of political science in Taiwan. However, studies have mostly focused on domestic-level actors, with little attention paid to the effect of international institutions and actors. The aim of this paper is to examine the interaction between global environmental governance and intergovernmental relations with regard to environmental issues. Through an examination of the ICCAT decision to slash Taiwan’s bigeye tuna quota in 2005, this study presents the following findings. First, restraint powers in global economic governance come from diverse sources and take many different forms. Hence, the state must coordinate with other states and non-state actors. Second, the regulatory reform process for marine affairs in Taiwan is still at an early stage and new cooperation mechanisms have not yet been established. Consequently, it is difficult to build consensus among stakeholders. Third, although marine fishing rules and oversight
mechanisms in Taiwan have undergone revision, there are still many areas for improvement, including intergovernmental structure, educational policy, and regulatory regime. Finally, the interaction between global environmental governance and intergovernmental relations consists of the following five stages:environmental consensus building and international institution construction,environmental monitoring, international pressuring, intergovernmental interaction,and lastly, policy and institution production. When thinking about the solution to global public problems, scholars working on intergovernmental relations should consider the role of international institutions and actors to gain a clearer picture.