文章詳目資料
軍法專刊
加入收藏
下載文章
| 篇名 | 買賣標的物遭假扣押與給付不能 |
|---|---|
| 卷期 | 58:1 |
| 並列篇名 | Provisional Seizure of the Subject Matter of A Sales Agreement and the Impossibility of Performance |
| 作者 | 李育昇 |
| 頁次 | 060-070 |
| 關鍵字 | 可歸責 、 債務不履行 、 給付不能 、 給付遲延 、 假扣押 、 Attributable 、 non-performance of obligation 、 impossibility of performance 、 delay in per-formance 、 delay in performance |
| 出刊日期 | 201202 |
中文摘要
買賣契約成立之後，若買賣標的物遭第三人假扣押，而致出賣人無法依買賣契約所定之時間將標的物交付與買受人，此時出賣人無法及時履行買賣契約義務，應評價為給付遲
延或是給付不能，且是否可歸責於出賣人，對於買賣雙方之權益影響甚鉅。本文將從實務見解作分析，並佐以美國法之學說，對此問題進行研究。
英文摘要
After a sales agreement is executed, if the subject matter of that sales agreement is seized provisionally and the seller is then incapable of performing the contractual obligation and transferring the ownership of the subject matter to the buyer, the purpose of the agreement may not be fulfilled in time. It might be questionable about whether the seller shall be responsible for this delay in performing the contractual obligation. In this article, discussion will be brought on this issue together with analysis of the courts' decisions with comparison with the US laws.