篇名 | 優納斯責任倫理學的教育涵義探究 |
---|---|
卷期 | 10:2 |
並列篇名 | Inquiry into the Educational Implications about Hans Jonas' Ethics of Responsibility |
作者 | 梁福鎮 、 鄒慧美 |
頁次 | 069-090 |
關鍵字 | 優納斯 、 責任倫理學 、 遠慮倫理學 、 Has Jonas 、 Ethics of responsibility 、 Remote ethics |
出刊日期 | 201112 |
本文採用教育詮釋學方法,對優納斯的責任倫理學進行研究,探討優納斯責任倫理學的思想淵源、主要內涵、優劣德失和教育涵義。優納斯的責任倫理學深受康德義務論倫理學、達爾文生物演化論、懷海德自然哲學和海德格存有論哲學的影響;其責任倫理學的內涵主要包括自然存有論、非相互責任論和實踐方法論三個部份。優納斯的責任倫理學在科技發展、倫理論述和生態教育上具有重要涵義,可以提供我國作為科技教育、倫理教育和生態教育的參考,相當值得我們加
以重視。
This article adapts the method of educational hermeneutics to discuss the origin of thought, main contents, advantages and disadvantages and educational implications about Jonas’ ethics of responsibility. Jonas’ ethics of responsibility affected by Kant’s deontological ethics,Darwin’s biological evolutionary theory,whitehead’s philosophy of nature and Heidegger’s ontological philosophy, Jonas’ethics of responsibility includes three parts: ontology of nature, non-mutual responsibility theory and methodology of practice. Jonas’ ethics of responsibility
has important implications in technical development, ethical discourse and
ecological education. It can as reference for technical education, ethical education and ecological education for our country. Therefore, Jonas’ ethics of responsibility deserves our attention.