民初的疑古思潮，既解構 (deconstruction) 了《詩經》的經典地位，繼而須建構 (construction)《詩經》的文學性質，二者均對《詩經》白話註譯的發展，產生了重大的影響。筆者已完成前者的探究，本文擬繼續探討疑古思潮中究竟有哪些建構《詩經》文學性質的主張，進而影響《詩經》白話註譯的發展，使其產生了哪些相應的發展轉變、進程表現與學術意義，並給予其適當的評析。蓋疑古學者主張以多元視角欣賞詩篇文藝，視《詩》為樂歌、歌謠，以諷誦涵詠體會詩意，如此從《詩》的內容及欣賞、研究法，建構出《詩》的文學性質，對《詩經》白話註譯的發展，分別產生了註譯內涵、註譯文體、註譯方式的轉變。以上在註譯理論與實務上的成果雖未能精確、完善，然對往後註譯《詩經》的工作，起到了一定程度的示範作用，自有其價值與貢獻。

The doubt history thought in the beginning of ROC has deconstructed the classic position of the Book of Odes, and has constructed the literature character of the Book of Odes. Both of factors have important influence on development of the Book of Odes vernacular Chinese annotation. The author has finished the former study. This study continues to discuss what views construct the Book of Odes literature character in the doubt history thought and further influences the development of the Book of Odes vernacular Chinese annotation. The study also comments and analyses the the Book of Odes vernacular chinese annotation influence about changing, process, and expression. The scholar of doubt history advocates that using a multi-cultural perspective to admire the art of poems. They regard the Book of Odes as songs, and realize the meaning by speaking in the poet’s point of view. Thus, constructing the Book of Odes literature character through the contents, admiration, and study methods of the Book of Odes results in the changing of vernacular chinese annotation contents, literary form, and ways. Though the above-mentioned is not accurate or complete in vernacular Chinese annotation theory and practice, it also has a certain degree of demonstrate effect in the future vernacular chinese annotation. And the achievement also has its value and devotion.