一般電話訪問的抽樣設計方式有任意成人法與戶中選樣法兩種，前者屬非機率性抽樣，後者則為機率抽樣。一般研究大多針對改善任意成人法的非機率性缺失，以調整樣本結構的缺點，但也有以實證調查的結果，比對任意成人法與戶中選樣法在樣本結構上的差異，不過大多忽略不同抽樣方法在實際執行檢驗項目上所可能產生的效應。本文即以2004年我國總統大選為主題，同時進行任意成人法與戶中選樣法，以探查不同抽樣在單一檢驗項自一一支持度的效應。本研究在控制各種變項後，發現兩項調查呈現迴異的結果，亦即兩種調查不但有支持度的差異，甚至在領先趨蟄上也呈現相連的情形。在比對交叉分析後，發現在18個層別中，有7個層別呈現趨勢相逆的現象，而且也發現任意成人法對現任者陳呂配支持度有膨脹的效應，而戶中選樣法對現任者陳呂配則有收縮的效應，顯示在轉換成支持度後，呈現對某組候選人較為有利或不利的調查結果。因此不同的抽樣仍有超越其本身差異的效應存在，值得調查機構在運用與解讀分析上，做為審慎參考的依據。

As to the sampling scheme of telephone interview， the popular methods are noselecting and within-household respondent selecting. The former belongs to a kind of the non-probability sampling， the later the probability sampling. Most studies of related fields modify the shortage of non-probability sampling in noselecting method and adapt its' sample frame. However， these studies neglect the inconsistency caused by different sampling methods. By checking polls of Taiwanese presidential election in 2004， this paper contrasts the survey results of noselecting and within-household respondent selecting， focusing on candidates' support ratings and leading tendency. By analyzing the interrelation， this study reveals inconsistency in 7 out of 18 strata. Itindi cates that noselecting method causes an effect of inflation in “currentposition" bias toward Chen-Lu pair， while withinhousehold respondent selecting has an opposite effect. This research concludes different sampling methods do have impact on survey results.